calm-intern-65863
10/30/2025, 4:42 PMcalm-intern-65863
10/30/2025, 4:46 PMstocky-father-81239
10/30/2025, 4:51 PMpulumi preview often is: Shouldn't it just compare the resources in my code with those in the state (which should be nearly instantaneous)? However, it seems pulumi preview (even with --refresh false) still connects to Azure in the background. Why is that? Is there a way to prevent that?ripe-appointment-29880
10/31/2025, 8:01 AMgreat-sunset-355
10/31/2025, 8:16 AM[components/{go,nodejs}] Send component inputs to be saved in state. This brings NodeJS and Go inline with Python behaviour
caused by
error: pre-step event returned an error: failed to save snapshot: serializaing checkpoint: marshalling checkpoint: json: unsupported value: +Inf
error: update failed
+ snapshotRetentionDays: {
+ def : {
+ checks: [
+ [0]: {}
]
+ type : "number"
}
+ format : <null>
+ isFinite : true
+ isInt : false
+ maxValue : +Inf
+ minValue : 0
+ type : "number"
+ ~standard: {
+ vendor : "zod"
+ version: 1
}
}
export abstract class LambdaFunction<Def extends config.ServiceDef> extends pulumi.ComponentResource {
protected readonly rcName: lib.pulumi.ResourceNameFn;
fn: aws.lambda.Function;
role: aws.iam.Role;
rolePolicy: aws.iam.RolePolicy;
public readonly region: string;
public readonly observabilityEnvironment: string;
protected readonly eventInvokeConfig: aws.lambda.FunctionEventInvokeConfig | undefined;
protected serviceDef: Def;
protected args: FunctionArgs<Def>;
protected constructor(
name: string,
args: FunctionArgs<Def>,
opts?: pulumi.ComponentResourceOptions,
type?: string,
extras?: BaseExtras
) {
super(type ?? "org:aws:lambda:Function", name, args, opts);
// ....
}}stocky-father-81239
10/31/2025, 9:26 AMboundless-waiter-17971
11/01/2025, 8:28 AMAccessToken provider (https://www.pulumi.com/registry/packages/pulumiservice/api-docs/accesstoken/) does not seem to allow to specify for a user. What would you suggest?thousands-raincoat-48772
11/02/2025, 1:12 PM-v=11 --logflow --logtostderr flags to pulumi by editing sst code, I got a lot of logs but none of them seem to tell why did it exit
Someone else suffered from the same issue, they say that upgrading Github Actions Runner spec with more compute and RAM fixed the issue for them, for me I run the command on my laptop, here are my laptop specs: 24GB RAM, AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS CPU, and NVMe disk
I guess pulumi exits due to memory error or something even though I don't see any out-of-memory errors logged.
I tried changing my OS limits for open files through ulimit(my OS is Arch Linux) without any luck
Pulumi version is 3.205(I upgraded what sst uses) but versions dating back to 3.146 didn't work.
Nodejs version is 22.20, I'm using Typescript.
As for my stack, it seems that the number of deployed resources is what causes the problem not a specific resource, this has been confirmed by removing resource A and trying then adding resource A back and delete resource B instead and trying the command
Whether I remove resource A or B the command preview succeeds, but keeping both of them fail the command(this is just a demonstration, the number of resources is way bigger than that)thousands-raincoat-48772
11/02/2025, 1:14 PMmodern-spring-15520
11/03/2025, 7:18 PMsquare-jelly-62919
11/04/2025, 6:56 AMwooden-portugal-65883
11/05/2025, 9:01 AMbrash-rocket-72925
11/05/2025, 5:48 PMLimitations
Initially, MFA in Pulumi Cloud will support TOTP (time-based one-time passwords) and it will only be available for Pulumi Cloud-backed users. Users authenticating with a third party (such as GitHub or GitLab) will need to use MFA through those providers at this time. Some other future improvements we are considering and will prioritize based on feedback we hear from customers are extending support for WebAuthN/passkeys, Duo, SMS/Email OTP and admins enforcing MFA for their entire organization.Yet maybe that is out of date?
nutritious-umbrella-50077
11/06/2025, 1:00 AMfunction pulumiBootstrap() {
const execCommand = process.argv.join(' ');
if (process.env.AWS_VAULT !== "abc-profile") {
throw new Error(`Run from: aws-vault exec abc-profile -- ${execCommand}`);
}
}boundless-receptionist-75917
11/06/2025, 12:07 PMechoing-battery-61643
11/06/2025, 10:20 PMthankful-musician-56035
11/07/2025, 9:11 AMfamous-ambulance-44173
11/10/2025, 2:27 PMmodern-spring-15520
11/10/2025, 6:04 PMbillowy-hydrogen-16048
11/15/2025, 3:49 PMbored-dentist-51768
11/17/2025, 1:38 PMmodern-spring-15520
11/17/2025, 6:57 PMrough-ice-18151
11/18/2025, 3:58 PMkind-napkin-56243
11/18/2025, 4:42 PMpulumi preview when making a pull request
• Use the protect resource option? (link)
• Have users merge in a change that uses the new operator preview functionality (link), then review the output of that, then make a second PR to remove the preview flag
Running a CI job that generates a preview and posts the output in a comment on the PR seems like the cleanest and safest option to me, but I don't know a way to de-translate the stack definition from the custom resource kubernetes manifest format! Has anyone else looked at this kind of problem? If so, would love to know what you came up with.mysterious-match-15905
11/18/2025, 5:37 PMechoing-spring-97279
11/19/2025, 12:23 PMhigh-grass-3103
11/19/2025, 5:35 PMtemplate | url parameter in pulumi up ? it's not documented in the reference manualmany-telephone-49025
11/20/2025, 1:53 PMgifted-barista-41153
11/21/2025, 7:16 PMpulumi up on the latest version, it seems like changes (and “unchanged”) are being done sequentially instead of in parallel.
If I set PULUMI_PARALLEL=100, the first 100 are in parallel, and the rest is sequential
Pretty much only using AWS so maybe it’s an issue with the provider
Side note: previews are still fast, but the actual updates are notsilly-dress-88590
11/21/2025, 9:02 PM