dazzling-sundown-39670
09/25/2025, 10:32 PM~ scaleway:object/bucket:Bucket: (update) 🔒
This update doesn't have a diff, but it still needs to run on pulumi up
, and I don't want it todazzling-sundown-39670
09/26/2025, 8:26 AMerror: unrecognized resource type (Check): docker-buildindexImage
crooked-ram-3551
09/26/2025, 4:12 PMstaging-us-east-1
, prod-us-west-2
, etc), but then I started thinking about the global resources (like route53, global accelerator, MRAPs) and then I thought that we’d need a prod-globals
… but some regional resources need the global resource to exist FIRST and sometimes the global resource needs the REGIONAL resource to exist first. So that sorta suggests the need for having stack variants for pre-globals
and post-globals
. Am I nuts? I.e. in order to support 2 “environments” like staging
and `prod`in 2 regions, we’d need 8 pulumi stacks (!!!). That’s a lot but it would at least avoid any circular headaches with deployments/automation.
alternatively, there could be a single multi-region stack for each “environment” — that way there’s no cross-stack dependencies and the relationship between the variants of global- vs. regional-resources is explicit. But doing something like canary deployments where you release one region at a time would become a real bear to pull off…crooked-ram-3551
09/26/2025, 5:34 PMcrooked-ram-3551
09/26/2025, 8:20 PMpulumi destroy
😬?dazzling-art-25825
09/26/2025, 10:08 PMdazzling-art-25825
09/26/2025, 10:10 PMpulumi:pulumi:Stack: (same)
[urn=urn:pulumi:test::snowflakeDefinitions::pulumi:pulumi:Stack::snowflakeDefinitions-test]
+-snowflake:index/schema:Schema: (replace) 🔓
[id=TEST_BUSINESS_ANALYTICS_DB.PRIVATE]
[urn=urn:pulumi:test::snowflakeDefinitions::snowflake:index/schema:Schema::TEST_BUSINESS_ANALYTICS_DB.PRIVATE]
[provider=urn:pulumi:test::snowflakeDefinitions::pulumi:providers:snowflake::default_2_6_0::bc0356d8-dc13-4223-ac09-07c026ccdd53]
- dataRetentionTimeInDays: 1
~ isTransient : "false" => "default"
- showOutputs : [
- [0]: {
- comment : ""
- createdOn : "2024-04-04 17:33:47.509 -0700 PDT"
- databaseName : "TEST_BUSINESS_ANALYTICS_DB"
- droppedOn : "0001-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 UTC"
- isCurrent : false
- isDefault : false
- name : "PRIVATE"
- options : ""
- owner : "ACCOUNTADMIN"
- ownerRoleType: "ROLE"
- retentionTime: "1"
}
]
~ withManagedAccess : "false" => "default"
dazzling-art-25825
09/26/2025, 10:43 PMproud-painting-63563
09/27/2025, 4:13 PMproud-painting-63563
09/29/2025, 2:16 PMhigh-grass-3103
09/29/2025, 2:49 PMmany-telephone-49025
09/30/2025, 8:32 AMbored-shoe-58804
09/30/2025, 5:33 PMdazzling-sundown-39670
10/01/2025, 1:49 PMcrooked-ram-3551
10/01/2025, 8:13 PMpulumi preview
etc. show that there are no changes, but when I look in the AWS dashboard I can see that one region still has the old code. This is an app with one stack that deploys to 2 region.
I think the culprit is somehow this:
code=pulumi.FileArchive("path/to/lambda.zip"),
I even tried making 2 copies of the file (one for each region), but pulumi still isn’t seeing that one of the lambdas needs to be updated. 🤔
Any ideas?icy-controller-6092
10/02/2025, 3:38 AMconfig:
kubernetes:namespace: my_project-{stack}
icy-controller-6092
10/02/2025, 6:20 AMDOCKER_REGISTRY_PASS
and DOCKER_REGISTRY_USER
but they dont work unless you add this config
config:
docker:registryAuth:
- address: <http://ghcr.io|ghcr.io>
im trying to move completely away from configuring providers in stacks and switch to env vars. is there a workaround here?
not sure why it needs address because the name im passing to getRegistryImage
is fully-qualified to ghcr.iogreat-sunset-355
10/02/2025, 10:32 AMerror: [403] You do not have permission to perform this operation.
Is pulumi team
subscription still limited to 1 admin?full-nest-77090
10/02/2025, 1:32 PMGoogleIDPMetadata.xml
into the Pulumi Membership requirements setup wizard, but I get an error:
Error Changing Requirements
Bad Request: ERR_OMU_PERSONAL_STACKS: Requesting user has active programs in a single-user organization.Can anyone help me resolve this?
hallowed-shoe-53735
10/02/2025, 5:09 PMretainOnDelete
and k8s.yaml.ConfigGroup
. I can set retainOnDelete
on the ConfigGroup
itself, but the child resources (the things in a specified yaml file) don't seem to inherit that setting. Is there any way to make that setting propagate to those child resources? alternatively, is there a way to manually add the marker via cli?adorable-agency-45573
10/03/2025, 2:15 AMaws:timestreaminfluxdb:DbInstance (scan-event-influxdb-eu-west-1):
error: creating Amazon Timestream for InfluxDB DB Instance ("scan-event-influxdb-eu-west-1-instance"): operation error Timestream InfluxDB: CreateDbInstance, https response error StatusCode: 400, RequestID: 451efc9d-4854-4e44-ba88-e349b623f095, ConflictException: The DbInstance with id [989171ap4k], name [scan-event-influxdb-eu-west-1-instance], customer [590309927493] already exists: operation error Timestream InfluxDB: CreateDbInstance, https response error StatusCode: 400, RequestID: 451efc9d-4854-4e44-ba88-e349b623f095, ConflictException: The DbInstance with id [....], name [scan-event-influxdb-eu-west-1-instance], customer [...] already exists
dazzling-sundown-39670
10/06/2025, 12:28 PMdocker.Container
and container registry? I've added registryAuth
to the docker provider, but it can't find the images. Pushing works fine thoughagreeable-translator-5323
10/06/2025, 2:53 PM"@pulumi/pulumi": "^3.130.0",
"@pulumi/gcp": "^9.2.0"
now all of my resources want to add the new pulumiLabels
entry and i'm failing with this error on all of my dns records
googleapi: Error 400: The field 'entity.managedZone.id' cannot be modified., immutableField
naturally, don't want to delete my managedZone and recreate to get past this but unsure of what to do next.careful-balloon-42392
10/06/2025, 8:10 PMgifted-balloon-26385
10/07/2025, 4:50 PMimportant-leather-28796
10/08/2025, 11:28 AMRangeError: Invalid string length
?microscopic-manchester-29988
10/08/2025, 1:24 PMmicroscopic-manchester-29988
10/08/2025, 1:29 PMrefined-needle-44251
10/09/2025, 9:12 PMoperation UPDATE failed with "GeneralServiceException": Service returned error code InternalFailure (Service: ArcRegionSwitch, Status Code: 500, Request ID: 6db4ab0c-5e8b-40cb-9ce7-b48fbb70a1ed) (SDK Attempt Count: 4)
. Not sure if this feature is just not fully covered yet?
ungraceful: {
failover: "failover"
}
narrow-match-14013
10/10/2025, 7:46 PM.
as it works, this usually works but we still occasionally see heartbeat timeouts even with relatively long timeouts (3 minutes)
Are there any other ways to hook into pulumi to know if it is still "alive"? some kind of healthcheck we can do on it?
The coarse solution would be to just check if the pulumi process is still running at all...