pulumi-community #contribute

adventurous-jordan-10043

08/10/2018, 6:37 PM

When is 0.15 expected btw ?

bitter-oil-46081

08/10/2018, 6:38 PM

Current thinking is early next week. Could change depending on how our validation and bug bashing over the weekend goes.

adventurous-jordan-10043

08/10/2018, 6:53 PM

Nice thanks

stocky-spoon-28903

08/15/2018, 7:56 PM

Is the source for pulumi.io available for pull requesting to?

big-piano-35669

08/15/2018, 7:57 PM

Yep! It's https://github.com/pulumi/docs. It of course uses Pulumi to deploy itself simple smile

tall-librarian-49374

08/25/2018, 7:32 PM

As far as I can see, .NET support has no progress in last months. Not a priority?

big-piano-35669

08/26/2018, 4:43 PM

@bitter-oil-46081 made some progress here, but regrettably we haven't had the cycles to advance it any further, and I'm not sure of the latest (perhaps Matt can reply back with a summary). We would love to work with some folks to get this going -- do you think we could find critical mass of interested parties to help out?

tall-librarian-49374

08/26/2018, 7:37 PM

I don't have an impression of how big of a task that could be... I think people would use it, but not sure if it's easy to find contributors.

adventurous-jordan-10043

08/27/2018, 7:17 PM

I'm trying to learn a bit more about tfbridge and tfgen by creating a provider but I'm getting a lot of weird errors

adventurous-jordan-10043

08/27/2018, 7:18 PM

-.sh

stocky-spoon-28903

08/28/2018, 10:46 PM

Slightly off topic, but @big-piano-35669 gets referenced in the new Go proposals for error handling: https://go.googlesource.com/proposal/+/master/design/go2draft-error-handling.md#midori

❤️ 1

🕺 1

😂 2

adventurous-jordan-10043

08/29/2018, 1:34 PM

I have a hard time finding what exactly is a pulumi provider

adventurous-jordan-10043

08/29/2018, 1:34 PM

Is it the combination of the sdk generated by tfgen + the RPC server running inside the binary created by tfbridge ?

adventurous-jordan-10043

08/29/2018, 1:35 PM

or just the tfbridge binary

rough-oil-1458

09/02/2018, 11:00 AM

Was something added recently to logging?

rough-oil-1458

09/02/2018, 11:00 AM

Copy code

go install -ldflags "-X <http://github.com/Smithx10/pulumi-vsphere/pkg/version.Version=v0.15.0-1535885617-ga420be6|github.com/Smithx10/pulumi-vsphere/pkg/version.Version=v0.15.0-1535885617-ga420be6>" <http://github.com/Smithx10/pulumi-vsphere/cmd/pulumi-tfgen-vsphere|github.com/Smithx10/pulumi-vsphere/cmd/pulumi-tfgen-vsphere>
# <http://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-terraform/pkg/tfbridge|github.com/pulumi/pulumi-terraform/pkg/tfbridge>
/Users/bruce.smith/go/src/github.com/pulumi/pulumi-terraform/pkg/tfbridge/provider.go:95:61: not enough arguments in call to p.host.Log
        have ("context".Context, diag.Severity, string, string)
        want ("context".Context, diag.Severity, resource.URN, string, bool)

rough-oil-1458

09/02/2018, 11:01 AM

I get the same issue if I try to build statuscake also *

rough-oil-1458

09/02/2018, 12:38 PM

i didnt have the correct gopkg lock

rough-oil-1458

09/02/2018, 12:38 PM

:(I

big-piano-35669

09/02/2018, 3:48 PM

@creamy-potato-29402 I know you recently changed this signature, but then changed it back. Do you plan to push stuff downstream soon? @rough-oil-1458 Did make ensure to get the latest dependencies unblock you for now?

white-balloon-205

09/02/2018, 3:52 PM

We need to adopt the latest pulumi (which undoes the earlier change) into pulumi-terraform. Current master branches won’t build at head due to the “change back” in pulumi. @rough-oil-1458 if you lock to the same versions as Pulumi-aws or Pulumi-gcp use, you should be safe.

rough-oil-1458

09/02/2018, 3:52 PM

@white-balloon-205 That is what I did

👍 1

rough-oil-1458

09/02/2018, 3:53 PM

But I'm curious.... I'm guessing I'll have to patch it soon 🙂

rough-oil-1458

09/02/2018, 3:55 PM

Is there a style Convention that we are sticking to for resource, datasources?

rough-oil-1458

09/02/2018, 3:55 PM

Currently, I'm just doing...

Copy code

Resources: map[string]*tfbridge.ResourceInfo{
                        "vsphere_virtual_machine": {Tok: vsphereResource(vsphereMod, "VirtualMachine")},
                },
                DataSources: map[string]*tfbridge.DataSourceInfo{
                        "vsphere_virtual_machine": {Tok: vsphereDataSource(vsphereMod, "getVirtualMachine")},
                },

👍 1

big-piano-35669

09/02/2018, 3:58 PM

That looks good to me! The functions cut down on repeating the package/module parts of the names. Single line looks good for just Tok, usually multiline only if specifying Fields too.

rough-oil-1458

09/02/2018, 3:59 PM

at first glance, I noticed that my completions in vim / vscode were a bit vague

rough-oil-1458

09/02/2018, 3:59 PM

I'll check that out later

big-piano-35669

09/02/2018, 4:00 PM

Are you working on VMware vSphere? 😊 If yes, cool! Don't hesitate to let us know how we can help.

rough-oil-1458

09/02/2018, 4:04 PM

Yes.