pulumi-community #general

quaint-queen-37896

06/29/2018, 2:40 AM

sup

👋 4

stocky-spoon-28903

06/29/2018, 6:24 PM

Am I missing something obvious, or is there not a way to set environment variables for an

aws.serverless.Function

bitter-oil-46081

06/29/2018, 9:11 PM

I do not think you are missing something obvious, @stocky-spoon-28903, while

aws.lambda.Function

exposes an environment property, we do not expose a similar property on

aws.serverless.Function

. I believe it would be as simple as adding

environment?: string[]

aws,serverless.FunctionOptions

and threading it down. Does that sound right @white-balloon-205 or I am missing something subtle here?

white-balloon-205

06/29/2018, 11:46 PM

We've released Pulumi 0.14.1! More details in #announcements. Happy weekend hacking to all! 🙂

adventurous-wire-92385

06/29/2018, 11:52 PM

Is there an equivalent term for "chart" in pulumi? For example if I were making a contained component for Nginx-Ingress or something? "pulumi-module-nginxingress"?

big-soccer-75859

06/30/2018, 8:20 PM

I noticed today that when pulumi serializes a function it doesn't ignore commented out lines and tries to actually work with them

big-soccer-75859

06/30/2018, 8:22 PM

Also I worked out that serializing lodash appears to fail because in lodash they often do things like

var isArray = Array.isArray

and then pulumi can't work with that because isArray serializes as

function isArray() { [native code] }

big-soccer-75859

06/30/2018, 8:23 PM

I'm not 100% sure, but I think if they had just kept it as

Array.isArray

a serialization wouldn't be attempted (correct me if I'm wrong)

big-soccer-75859

06/30/2018, 8:24 PM

I'm not a javascript guru enough to know a solution around this

big-soccer-75859

06/30/2018, 9:14 PM

note: this doesn't affect code that uses

require('lodash')

within the actual function closure because pulumi interprets that differently and doesn't try to serialize anything. It's only if you use

import

require

outside of the function closure and then use that imported library within the closure

big-soccer-75859

06/30/2018, 9:25 PM

I found a couple of related issues so I'll watch progress on those. https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/issues/249

big-piano-35669

07/01/2018, 1:17 AM

Thanks @big-soccer-75859, please do let us know if you see anything not captured by that bug. Generally speaking, importing on the inside of a function should work around most (all?) of these issues. I realize, however, that this isn't idiomatic and what we would all write by default, so we will be spending some time next week discussing what to do here. Earlier on, we serialized modules differently -- so they led to actual requires during deserialization -- and it feels like this would address all of the issues we are seeing. Stay tuned and thanks for the great feedback!

💯 1

miniature-potato-84713

07/02/2018, 3:48 AM

Given this post: https://medium.com/@serverpunch/why-you-should-not-use-google-cloud-75ea2aec00de How would this manifest with Pulumi?

stocky-spoon-28903

07/02/2018, 9:11 AM

Is that not independent of provisioning mechanism?

creamy-potato-29402

07/02/2018, 5:09 PM

If I’m understanding correctly, this is the machinery of gcloud threatening to deactivate people’s infrastructure. This is orthogonal to pulumi.

important-jackal-88836

07/02/2018, 11:44 PM

Does anyone know if the Terraform TLS provider or similar has been integrated into Pulumi?

bitter-oil-46081

07/03/2018, 12:11 AM

@important-jackal-88836 I don’t believe anything like that has been done yet. Some folks have done a little work around pulimifying some other existing terraform providers and if it’s something you’re interested in trying, we can point you at some examples.

chilly-crayon-57653

07/03/2018, 12:11 AM

For an existing Terraform Resource Provider (like TLS); you can also use Terraform Bridge; see https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-terraform/blob/master/README.md for a description of the overall structure and process of adding a new provider using the bridge and https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/blob/master/resources.go for a specific example.

adventurous-wire-92385

07/03/2018, 2:14 AM

😞 I'm like 45 minutes into trying to get this building in a container. Does anyone have a Dockerfile that builds from source reliably? Even with

make ensure

I'm getting missing go dependencies when I run

make

creamy-potato-29402

07/03/2018, 2:15 AM

huh weird.

creamy-potato-29402

07/03/2018, 2:15 AM

I don’t.

creamy-potato-29402

07/03/2018, 2:15 AM

by “this” you mean pulumi/pulumi

creamy-potato-29402

07/03/2018, 2:15 AM

adventurous-wire-92385

07/03/2018, 2:16 AM

yeah, looks like

make ensure

doesn't call

dep ensure

creamy-potato-29402

07/03/2018, 2:16 AM

weird, my understanding is that it shoudl.

adventurous-wire-92385

07/03/2018, 2:17 AM

just added

dep ensure &&

in front of

make ensure && make

and it definitely got farther. I was going to look at source but I don't want to dig into common.mk for now if I can help it

adventurous-wire-92385

07/03/2018, 2:20 AM

I'm losing track of every thing I'm having to add though, maybe it was when I was still

go get ...dep

instead of

...dep/cmd/dep

creamy-potato-29402

07/03/2018, 2:21 AM

can you share your dockerfile?

adventurous-wire-92385

07/03/2018, 2:21 AM

and now a bunch of metalinter stuff...

adventurous-wire-92385

07/03/2018, 2:21 AM

one sec