powerful-ram-56107
09/18/2019, 3:11 PMpulumi
question: I want to use GCP beta features (specifically this one: https://cloud.google.com/kubernetes-engine/docs/reference/rest/v1beta1/projects.locations.clusters#Cluster.ConsumptionMeteringConfig).
From the documentation and blog posts it seems pulumi
supports GCP beta features, but the Typescript types in pulumi/gcp@1.0.0
do not support it.
Is it that it's just a bit behind GCP? If yes, how much?swift-painter-31084
09/18/2019, 6:29 PMchilly-photographer-60932
09/18/2019, 7:13 PMcni
along with eks
using https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-eks . How can we override the default CNI which gets installed with pulumi-eks
?billowy-laptop-45963
09/18/2019, 9:32 PMworried-city-86458
09/19/2019, 2:49 AMaws:route53:Record (Dev-Eks-nodeInternalElbDns):
error: Plan apply failed: AccessDenied: User: <arn> is not authorized to access this resource
status code: 403, request id: ba3a64a7-d984-4bd7-be97-12624890e903
powerful-ram-56107
09/19/2019, 7:49 AMpulumi
"accept" pre-existing objects with the same name/ID as described in the sources into the current stack? I mean similar to pulumi refresh
, but without the resources being present in the stack already. I imagine a workflow where one does:
1. pulumi accept
, which writes the objects into the stack as is; strongly suggesting to continue with step 2 afterwards
2. pulumi up --expect-no-changes
, until the code fits the current stack state againrhythmic-finland-36256
09/19/2019, 12:36 PMazure.sql.SQLServer
and inside of it some `azure.sql.Database`s with pulumi?fresh-summer-65887
09/19/2019, 3:36 PMbillowy-laptop-45963
09/19/2019, 5:09 PMincalculable-engineer-92975
09/19/2019, 8:46 PMpurple-appointment-43233
09/19/2019, 9:05 PMworried-city-86458
09/20/2019, 12:08 AMworried-city-86458
09/20/2019, 12:11 AMworried-city-86458
09/20/2019, 12:28 AMworried-city-86458
09/20/2019, 3:19 AMconst fluentBit = new k8s.yaml.ConfigFile("fluent-bit.yml", {}, { parent: cluster, provider: cluster.provider });
I had to specify the provider too - I would've thought it could deduce that from the parent?worried-city-86458
09/20/2019, 3:21 AMdamp-room-71337
09/20/2019, 10:49 AMdamp-room-71337
09/20/2019, 10:50 AMpulumi up --config myAppImageTag=${CIRCLE_SHA}
but that doesn’t seem to be supported. Do pulumi config set ...
outside the orb first or something?brash-plastic-65797
09/20/2019, 4:37 PMincalculable-diamond-5088
09/20/2019, 5:50 PMstable/prometheus-redis-exporter
helm chart fails to install ServiceMonitor
. Probably because of the following line:
{{- if and ( .Capabilities.APIVersions.Has "<http://monitoring.coreos.com/v1|monitoring.coreos.com/v1>" ) ( .Values.serviceMonitor.enabled ) }}
in https://github.com/helm/charts/blob/master/stable/prometheus-redis-exporter/templates/servicemonitor.yaml
Is there a workaruond?quaint-queen-45003
09/20/2019, 6:35 PMbrash-plastic-65797
09/20/2019, 6:54 PMworried-engineer-33884
09/20/2019, 7:04 PMadamant-dress-73325
09/20/2019, 8:36 PMtask.run({ cluster });
on a FargateTaskDefinition at the top-level of our pulumi program during update? We are trying to run a one-off task inside a container, without needing lambda like in https://www.pulumi.com/docs/guides/crosswalk/aws/ecs/#running-fire-and-forget-tasks .colossal-room-15708
09/21/2019, 7:51 AMpulumi preview
right after it successfully deployed the stack and it's now saying that it wants to replace the cosmosDB database. Why is that?
Looks like this all starts because the consistencyPolicy
needs updating?!
cosmos_db_account = Account(
"cosmosdbaccount",
consistency_policy={
"consistencyLevel": "Strong",
"maxIntervalInSeconds": 5,
"maxStalenessPrefix": 10
},
geo_locations=[
{
"location": resource_group.location,
"failoverPriority":0
}
],
kind="GlobalDocumentDB",
location=resource_group.location,
offer_type="Standard",
resource_group_name=resource_group.name
)
I check the consistency setting in the Azure portal and it shows that it's set to "Strong", so no idea why pulumi thinks it has to reconfigure it to "Strong" and then replace all the other resources.
When I execute pulumi up
it applies a change to cosmosDB, not to any of the other resources it said it would. Once done, I can run pulumi preview
again and I get the same output as before where pulumi thinks it has to update and even replace multiple resources.big-nail-28315
09/21/2019, 7:53 PMthankful-optician-22583
09/23/2019, 4:58 PMthankful-optician-22583
09/23/2019, 4:58 PMthankful-optician-22583
09/23/2019, 5:04 PMbillowy-laptop-45963
09/23/2019, 6:14 PMbillowy-laptop-45963
09/23/2019, 6:14 PMwhite-balloon-205
09/23/2019, 7:13 PMbillowy-laptop-45963
09/23/2019, 9:02 PM