pulumi-community #general

general

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:29 PM

@fast-dinner-32080 - that almost works.. That works, but then when I attempt to run pulumi up I get

error: It looks like the Pulumi SDK has not been installed. Have you run npm install or yarn install?

fast-dinner-32080

03/13/2020, 11:30 PM

Were you able to run pulumi new and then up before and then this is happening when you created another stack in the same project?

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:30 PM

yes.. I think so.

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:30 PM

is there a way to initialize the stack files for a directory when selecting a stack to use?

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:31 PM

e.g. re-create the package.json and friends..

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:32 PM

or maybe I can run

pulumi new

to create the directory without (re)creating the stack

fast-dinner-32080

03/13/2020, 11:32 PM

Well a stack it part of an existing project. You shouldn't need to re-init it. You would create a project, develop against the default stack, then create new stacks (pulumi stack init) using the same index.

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:33 PM

so how are these laid out exactly?

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:34 PM

my aim is to have one root directory for the project, and then subdirectories for

admin

dev

and

prod

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:34 PM

so the thought was that Pulumi.yaml would go into the project directory..

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:34 PM

and then I could cd into

admin

and rnu either

pulumi stack init

pulumi stack select

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:35 PM

at least that's how I would assume this should work...

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:40 PM

since pulumi up uses index.ts... I assume that I have to have 1 directory per stack

fast-dinner-32080

03/13/2020, 11:42 PM

So think of a stack as an isolated environment/context with different configuration with the same underlying program/infra*. If you want different infra without a lot of dynamic then you would want different projects. Basically can have projects/admin, projects/dev, projects/prod and can just have a single stack. Then if they need to reference each other you can using stack references. Now if the infra is similar or you want to have a single program with more dynamic infra you can have a single project with the same program (maybe more if's/loops for dynamic stuff) and the environment is split using stacks (admin, dev, and prod). Then you would select the stack and it would run just for that stacks config. You can still reference each stack as well if necessary from others.

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:42 PM

hmm

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:42 PM

ok... the infra is pretty different between the three environments

fast-dinner-32080

03/13/2020, 11:43 PM

Then you can probably have different projects for each. Basically a stack can be used to have multiple configurations and state using the same program.

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:43 PM

gotcha..

fast-dinner-32080

03/13/2020, 11:44 PM

There is no right way to mix projects and stacks. It just depends on the use case. 😄

fast-dinner-32080

03/13/2020, 11:45 PM

and how you want to organize it

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:45 PM

so I will try to just destroy and re-create the project and then copy my index.ts

green-school-95910

03/13/2020, 11:45 PM

Multi-tenant deployments are a good example of stacks right @fast-dinner-32080? Same code, with different configs for each tenant

fast-dinner-32080

03/13/2020, 11:47 PM

Yea that is a good example. Another is if you deploy to multiple regions the same infra.

fast-dinner-32080

03/13/2020, 11:47 PM

and need to split up the deployments

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:48 PM

I see.. so the

index.ts

stays the same, and just the

Pulumi.stack.yaml

changes

nutritious-pager-34892

03/13/2020, 11:48 PM

@gentle-diamond-70147 Do you have a working version of that typescript example? I tried it and it has type issues because of package scp2 and seems there are more errors too as I tried to remove just that part and still get them.

worried-painting-67291

03/13/2020, 11:54 PM

is there a way to debug the Pulumi.config() loading process? I am getting an error with undefined config values and I think it's looking at the wrong file/keys

alert-artist-66265

03/13/2020, 11:59 PM

hello, im trying to create a secret with new k8s.core.v1.Secret()... do i need to pass the strings in base64 (as in regular k8s secrets) or just plain strings?

worried-painting-67291

03/14/2020, 12:06 AM

thanks all

polite-motherboard-78438

03/14/2020, 6:15 PM

hello. how can i convert an Ouput<String> to a simple string? I need it in th following example. The "members" array is a []string but the interpolate function always returns an Output<String>.

const member = pulumi.interpolate`serviceAccount:${serviceAccount.email}`;
const policyData = gcp.organizations.getIAMPolicy({
  bindings: [
    {
      role: "roles/storage.admin",
      members: [member]
    }
  ]
});

Title

polite-motherboard-78438

03/14/2020, 6:15 PM

hello. how can i convert an Ouput<String> to a simple string? I need it in th following example. The "members" array is a []string but the interpolate function always returns an Output<String>.

const member = pulumi.interpolate`serviceAccount:${serviceAccount.email}`;
const policyData = gcp.organizations.getIAMPolicy({
  bindings: [
    {
      role: "roles/storage.admin",
      members: [member]
    }
  ]
});

faint-table-42725

03/14/2020, 8:09 PM

You should be able to wrap the

get

itself within an apply, e.g.

policyData = serviceAccount.email.apply(email =>
    gcp.organizations.getIAMPolicy(...))

(policyData will now be an

Output<GetIAMPolicyResult>

which you can use elsewhere

polite-motherboard-78438

03/15/2020, 10:20 AM

cool. it works 👍

well, I need to add another service account from another property. How can I do it with this solution?

const policyData = serviceAccount.email.apply(email =>
  gcp.organizations.getIAMPolicy({
    bindings: [
      {
        role: "roles/storage.admin",
        members: [
          "serviceAccount:" + email,
          "serviceAccount:" + gcpServiceAccount
        ]
      }
    ]
  })
);

const bucketPolicy = new gcp.storage.BucketIAMPolicy("velero", {
  bucket: bucket.id,
  policyData: policyData.policyData
});

faint-table-42725

03/15/2020, 4:53 PM

You can use

pulumi.all

— you might want to take a look at https://www.pulumi.com/docs/intro/concepts/programming-model/#outputs if you haven’t already

polite-motherboard-78438

03/21/2020, 3:54 PM

I stumbled upon

pulumi.all

in the unit tests documentation today Will try

Not sure if I am using correctly:

const policyData = pulumi
  .all([serviceAccount.email, gcpServiceAccount])
  .apply(([veleroServiceAccount, gcpServiceAccount]) => {
    gcp.organizations.getIAMPolicy({
      bindings: [
        {
          role: "roles/storage.admin",
          members: [
            "serviceAccount:" + veleroServiceAccount,
            "serviceAccount:" + gcpServiceAccount
          ]
        }
      ]
    });
  });

But now policyData is an instance of

pulumi.OutputInstance<void>

and not

Output<GetIAMPolicyResult>

faint-table-42725

03/23/2020, 3:12 AM

The compiler sees

=> { … }

as a void function. You should remove that extra set of braces and it should give you back what you want.

polite-motherboard-78438

04/18/2020, 10:23 AM

Thanks. it works now

View count: 1