Can't tell if I'm being silly but is there anyway to iterate a pulumi.Output<string[]> and create resources using each iterated value?

Since yesterday (31 March 2020), we have been seeing persistent 429 rate limit errors with the GCS state backend for pulumi. See this error irrespective of the size of pulumi stacks (even on newly created stacks) and even when only a single object from the stack is being created or modified. Also tried

pulumi up --parallel 1

for single threaded execution, but still see this error.

Diagnostics:
  gcp:kms:CryptoKeyIAMBinding (xxx-permissions):
    error: post-step event returned an error: failed to save snapshot: An IO error occurred during the current operation: blob (key ".pulumi/stacks/<stack-name>.json") (code=Unknown): googleapi: Error 429: The rate of change requests to the object <gcs-bucket-name>/.pulumi/stacks/<stack-name>.json exceeds the rate limit. Please reduce the rate of create, update, and delete requests., rateLimitExceeded

  pulumi:pulumi:Stack (<pulumi-project-name>-<stack-name>):
    error: update failed

We may have to give up on using GCS buckets entirely for storing pulumi state. Does anybody know about what could be causing this issue or any workarounds? Thanks. Have created github issue for this too: https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/issues/4258

Hi, trying to set up AKS on Azure, and it's failing on the resource group. The resource group already exists, so maybe that's the issue?

Diagnostics:
  azure:core:ResourceGroup (RD-FoundationalServices-rg):
    error: Error ensuring Resource Providers are registered.

    Terraform automatically attempts to register the Resource Providers it supports to
    ensure it's able to provision resources.

    If you don't have permission to register Resource Providers you may wish to use the
    "skip_provider_registration" flag in the Provider block to disable this functionality.

    Please note that if you opt out of Resource Provider Registration and Terraform tries
    to provision a resource from a Resource Provider which is unregistered, then the errors
    may appear misleading - for example:

    > API version 2019-XX-XX was not found for Microsoft.Foo

    Could indicate either that the Resource Provider "Microsoft.Foo" requires registration,
    but this could also indicate that this Azure Region doesn't support this API version.

    More information on the "skip_provider_registration" flag can be found here:
    <https://www.terraform.io/docs/providers/azurerm/index.html#skip_provider_registration>

    Original Error: Cannot register provider Microsoft.DocumentDB with Azure Resource Manager: resources.ProvidersClient#Register: Failure responding to request: StatusCode=403 -- Original Error: autorest/azure: Service returned an error. Status=403 Code="AuthorizationFailed" Message="The client <mailto:'jcarreira@mtb.com|'jcarreira@mtb.com>' with object id 'a25caa95-0e42-47b3-99a0-47bc2ba17ceb' does not have authorization to perform action 'Microsoft.DocumentDB/register/action' over scope '/subscriptions/7e01b735-d940-4f45-953c-08f86d80d43f' or the scope is invalid. If access was recently granted, please refresh your credentials.".

I just provisioned a new project using

npm install

, and after NPM was done installing packages it reported this:

found 21 low severity vulnerabilities
  run `npm audit fix` to fix them, or `npm audit` for details

Is this something that should be addressed?

npm audit

provides some verbose output that identifies the dependencies that affected. (I'm new to the NodeJS/npm world, so apologies if this is a stupid question.)

i asked a related question in the #kubernetes channel, but is there a way to generate my own auto-naming using the internal logic? i have two resources with cyclic dependencies (k8s pod that needs to know the name of its service)

I’m creating a type of tags like this

readonly tags: pulumi.Input<{
      [key: string]: pulumi.Input<string>;
    }>;

When I try to call a value in there like follows

pulumi.all([tags.t_env]).apply

I get error

Property 't_env' does not exist on type 'Input<{ [key: string]: Input<string>; }>'.
  Property 't_env' does not exist on type 'Promise<{ [key: string]: Input<string>; }>'.ts(2339)

is there something like pulumi.interpolate for dealing with files, or should i load into a string and do something else? ive got a configuration file that i want to add some Output’s to

How do I go about referencing existing resources? Specifically an AWS EKS cluster.. I don’t want to re-create it .. I just want to add node groups..

aws.eks.getCluster

doesn’t return a

Cluster

object..

How can I use pulumi stack output in github actions that are not managed by pulumi?

How to reference these output vars in next steps?

I am new to pulumi...I am using python...I want to write ami creation nd ec2 creation as two separate modules..and link two with "import"..is that possible similar to terraform import ?

BUG or FEATURE? I am using Pulumi v1.13.1 with a Azure Blob Container to store state. During "destroy" the only stack file that's kept is the one with the extension ".bak". If the operation is interrupted for any reason the stack is no longer present until the stack is restored from the backup file. Is this the intended behavior?

Why is ensurance that there are no ongoing updates exclusive to saas? Terraform manages it simply by placing a lock in some document db available on whatever cloud you are using. Why isn't this done in pulumi?

Is express.js comptaible with Pulumi? If so is there a code snippet / tuttorial for it?

This is what I am currently trying (but that doesn't seem to work as expected)

const greeting = new gcp.cloudfunctions.HttpCallbackFunction("greeting", ((req, res) => {
    try {
        app.get('/', async (req, res) => {
            res.send(JsonData);
        });
    } catch (err) {

    }
}));

(Want to work with different call methods)

For webhooks, do they only contain a url to the update or is there any details on the update itself?

I tried

pulumi stack import --file dev.checkpoint.json

It's a checkpoint file i edited I got following error after wanting to pulumi preview: error: .pulumi/stacks/dev.json: snapshot integrity failure; refusing to use it: resource urnpulumidev:lsdigitaloceanindex/kubernetesClusterKubernetesCluster:staging refers to unknown provider urnpulumidev:lspulumiprovidersdigitaloceandefault 1 6 0:*charactersequence* I am positive i did not change "provider" and that cluster is still running on DO cloud. Does anyone have an idea what I might've done wrong or how i can fix this?

Pluralsight has made all of our 7,000+ expert-led video courses FREE for the full month of April. #FreeApril #StayHomeSkillUp https://pluralsight.pxf.io/5JB59

can anyone help why this isnt working:

var bucket_name = <pulumi.Output<string>>s3.getOutput(`bucket_backup`);
var instance = new aws.ec2.Instance('instance', {
   ...
     userData: `
    #! /bin/bash
    # create template for deployment
    cat > vpnbackup.sed <<SED
    s|--BUCKET-NAME--|${bucket_name.apply(v=>v)}|
    ...

"Calling [toString] on an [Output<T>] is not supported.\n\nTo get the value of an Output<T> as an Output<string> consider either\n1 o.apply(v =>

prefix${v}suffix

)\n2: pulumi.interpolate `prefix${v}suffix`\n\nSee https://pulumi.io/help/outputs for more details."

success story… it took me about 5 mins to update my infrastructure with some new code… just

pulumi up --yes

and I can have a coffee while I know the rest is successfully updating ☺️

Nice!

FYI - when github has issues,

pulumi new

doesnt work:

devops@289876f91c69:/data/pulumi/infra/aws/ec2-jenkins-server$ pulumi new
error: unexpected client error: unexpected requesting "<https://github.com/pulumi/templates.git/info/refs?service=git-upload-pack>" status code: 504

https://www.githubstatus.com/

Anyone setup a Pulumi stack using Vagrant?

Hello, So I was looking at https://www.pulumi.com/blog/creating-and-reusing-cloud-components-using-package-managers/ Is there a python example for reusable infra components

Hoi ! I was wondering how you guys iterate over naming conventions in a pulumi stack ? Say you have you have function

genId

prefixing all your ids with the environment. i.e.

prod-<id>

but then later you change your mind and you want to use

<id>-prod

instead and change

genId

i know there are aliases, however, these are not really helpful when you use a function

genId

to generate these ids. For this change you would need to go through all the code and add an

aliases

section, and add the results of the old version of

genId

. Is there a better way ? Right now the quickest solution i found without using aliases is to call

pulumi destroy

. Thankfully i don’t care about uptime at the moment.

Hi, I found quite big flaw in

pulumi config set

command (for v1.14.0) when i tried to set value for structured configuration. When I run:

pulumi config set --path key.prop "1002000"

Result is

proj:key:
    prop: 1.002e+06

but for:

pulumi config set --path key.prop "100200"

proj:key:
    prop: 100200

Some one encountered this issue? Independently from this bug it would be nice to force save as text because it impacts program flow.

has anyone had any luck setting up the Pulumi GitHub App lately? I can't seem to get it to comment on a PR at all. I've been experimenting with both Google Cloud Build and GitHub actions to run

pulumi preview

and/or

pulumi up

as per the tutorials, and I've enabled the app for all repos in my organization, but it refuses to fire at all. Are there some undocumented naming convention rules about org/project/stack/repo naming that I'm missing?

For those that use pulumi to create ephemeral environments, how are you handling stack cleanup? I can handle resource cleanup in k8s with a CronJob but the stacks are still left over with their state intact. Once a branch is merged and deleted, CI doesn’t really do anything at that point.

Is there a way to use the static

get()

methods without providing an ID? I’d like to be able to

aws.alb.LoadBalancer.get('lb', undefined, <filters>)

to be able to lookup a load balancer having certain tags for example.