pulumi-community #general

green-musician-49057

04/15/2021, 7:08 PM

Anyone else get this error upgrading pulumi, on macOS Big Sur, using

brew upgrade pulumi

Copy code

==> Upgrading 1 outdated package:
pulumi 2.24.1 -> 2.25.0
==> Upgrading pulumi 2.24.1 -> 2.25.0 
==> Downloading <https://homebrew.bintray.com/pulumi-2.25.0.big_sur.bottle.1.tar.gz>
#=#=#                                                                         
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found
Trying a mirror...
==> Downloading <https://ghcr.io/v2/homebrew/core/pulumi-2.25.0.big_sur.bottle.1.tar.gz>
==> Downloading from <https://github.com/-/v2/packages/container/package/homebrew%2Fcore%2Fpulumi-2.25.0.big_sur.bottle.1.tar.gz>
#=#=#                                                                         
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 
Error: Failed to download resource "pulumi"
Download failed: <https://ghcr.io/v2/homebrew/core/pulumi-2.25.0.big_sur.bottle.1.tar.gz>

purple-train-14007

04/15/2021, 7:23 PM

Have you guys thought of adding Pulumi to

winget

? Microsoft just released their own packagemanager

👍 1

purple-train-14007

04/15/2021, 7:25 PM

^ It works with the msft store too so if you add pulumi there...

broad-dog-22463

04/15/2021, 7:49 PM

@purple-train-14007 we have... but Winget still requires an MSI / installer and Pulumi doesn't have that at this time

purple-train-14007

04/15/2021, 7:50 PM

Oh I see. Thanks such a quick response

broad-dog-22463

04/15/2021, 7:50 PM

As soon as they losen the restrictions it will be on there - it's why we leverage chocolatey atm

broad-dog-22463

04/15/2021, 7:51 PM

it's a simplier install

purple-train-14007

04/15/2021, 7:52 PM

What restrictions do they have set? (I actually dont know)

broad-dog-22463

04/15/2021, 7:53 PM

we'd need to have an msi to do what we do with pulumi - it doesn't allow us to script moving binaries to bins and adding to PATH

broad-dog-22463

04/15/2021, 7:53 PM

it would need to be embeded in the msi

purple-train-14007

04/15/2021, 7:58 PM

Oh! yeah thats a "security issue" in msfts eyes.

purple-train-14007

04/15/2021, 7:59 PM

I would be surprised if they laxed that imo

purple-train-14007

04/15/2021, 8:00 PM

Fingers crossed though. MSFT has been opening up more and more to the community lately on certain things.

freezing-memory-87554

04/16/2021, 8:16 AM

Anyone? :-)

icy-jordan-58549

04/16/2021, 10:01 AM

Copy code

error: getting user info from <https://api.pulumi.com>: performing HTTP request: Get "<https://api.pulumi.com/api/user>": dial tcp 37.57.111.6:443: i/o timeout

jolly-fountain-3864

04/16/2021, 2:43 PM

👋 I’m here! What’d I miss?

jolly-fountain-3864

04/16/2021, 2:44 PM

Question: How to I enable Https using Fargate and ECS with Pulumi ?

abundant-autumn-85033

04/16/2021, 5:30 PM

Ref; https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/issues/3061 - someone suggested using module-alias as a polyfill for being able to use

@path/whatever

type notations within their pulumi programmes - has anyone got this working here? no matter what i try, it just can't find the modules.

brave-angle-33257

04/16/2021, 8:07 PM

im using a

for( var loop_var of ['a', 'b'])

loop in node, and in the loop i'm using a

stackreference.getOutput("outputs").apply(x=>x[loop_var])

and I'm getting the same results on subsequent loops, it's like it's not reapplying to give me the new value on the next loop, is this a known bug or some weird closure situation?

fancy-eye-43334

04/17/2021, 5:13 PM

Hey all, new to Pulumi here coming from a few years of Terraform usage. One of the problems I feel Terraform hasn't solved well yet is modeling necessary imperative steps within the declarative configuration. For example, if I need to run some script with inputs from the creation of a resource, and have another resource depend on that script's output, it's certainly doable but clunky. It seems like Pulumi is in a good position to solve these problems but there's nothing really native yet. The closest thing I could find is this provisioners strategy. I've used this now to create a couple of provisioners: an "S3StaticReactProvisioner" that runs yarn to build a client side react app with necessary environment config baked in, and then runs aws sync to S3; a "DBProvisioner" that ensures any necessary SQL setup is performed (depends on an RDS resource) prior to spinning up an ECS Fargate task that requires it; and I'm considering an Ansible provisioner as well. Of course I could have scripts that run pulumi + psql + ansible, or other strategies through code, but I want to maintain the declarative-first approach and rely on Pulumi for intelligent dependency management. Is Pulumi planning on expanding this concept? It seems like a great opportunity for people to build provisioners and publish them on NPM / other package distribution systems for others to take advantage of. Or are there limitations I don't understand yet that hinder this?

billowy-laptop-45963

04/18/2021, 6:23 PM

I have a component library. I created a simple example of one of the components and added to my examples_test.go and all was well. I add a more complex example and now pulumi up just hangs without error or any messages. Creating a new example with

pulumi new

and doing

pulumi up

works. The moment I

yarn link @mylib

(without even using it in the code)

pulumi up

hangs. Anyone seen this before?

billowy-laptop-45963

04/18/2021, 11:40 PM

When creating an acm.Certificate, for the validations I use to do something like

Copy code

validations = [domainName, ...subjectAlternativeNames]
validationRecords = validations.map((domain, i) => new aws.route53.Record(`vr${i}`, { 
  name: cert.domainValidationOptions[i].resourceRecordName,
...
})

it seems like the aws.Certificate.domainValidationOptions[] ordering no longer matches my validations array. Is there a way to deterministically create the validation records?

billowy-laptop-45963

04/19/2021, 12:12 AM

My feeling is that I shouldn't create resources in another resources

.apply

eg:

Copy code

cert.domainValidationOptions.apply(options=>options.map(option=>new aws.route53.Record(...

is that correct?

breezy-butcher-78604

04/19/2021, 3:26 AM

will PulumiUP be recorded and made available after the event? Keen to watch but it's not on at a good time for me

brash-airline-37413

04/19/2021, 7:18 AM

Sorry I’ve looked everywhere but and can not seem to find the answer anywhere. How do I compare an

Output<string>

with a

string

brash-airline-37413

04/19/2021, 7:20 AM

apply function only returns an Output<string> and there doesn’t be a way to resolve that promise any further

sticky-match-71841

04/19/2021, 11:52 AM

brew ugprade pulumi

supposed to install the 3.0 RC?

Copy code

➜  services git:(develop) ✗ brew upgrade pulumi
==> Upgrading 1 outdated package:
pulumi 2.24.1 -> 3.0.0
==> Upgrading pulumi 2.24.1 -> 3.0.0 
==> Downloading <https://ghcr.io/v2/homebrew/core/pulumi/manifests/3.0.0>
######################################################################## 100.0%
==> Downloading <https://ghcr.io/v2/homebrew/core/pulumi/blobs/sha256:54d2d2d1823f55ae4951465619b11716a6177ee7d1c10a29751f366379556be4>
==> Downloading from <https://pkg-containers-az.githubusercontent.com/ghcr1/blobs/sha256:54d2d2d1823f55ae4951465619b11716a6177ee7d1c10a29751f366379556be4?se=2021-04-19T11%3A55%3A00Z&sig=bf3dGgi8X3ti%2FxR>
######################################################################## 100.0%
==> Pouring pulumi--3.0.0.big_sur.bottle.tar.gz
==> Caveats
zsh completions have been installed to:
  /usr/local/share/zsh/site-functions
==> Summary
🍺  /usr/local/Cellar/pulumi/3.0.0: 18 files, 134MB
Removing: /usr/local/Cellar/pulumi/2.24.1... (18 files, 142.6MB)

handsome-state-59775

04/19/2021, 12:09 PM

It seems the latest versions of

pulumi-tls

and

pulumi-azure-native

still depend on pulumi 2.x:

Copy code

Could not find a version that matches pulumi<3.0.0,<4.0.0,>=2.15.0,>=2.20.0,>=3.0.0 (from -r <http://requirements.in|requirements.in> (line 1))
Tried: [...]
There are incompatible versions in the resolved dependencies:
  pulumi (from -r <http://requirements.in|requirements.in> (line 1))
  pulumi<3.0.0,>=2.15.0 (from pulumi-tls==3.4.0->-r <http://requirements.in|requirements.in> (line 2))
  pulumi<4.0.0,>=3.0.0 (from pulumi-kubernetes==3.0.0->-r <http://requirements.in|requirements.in> (line 4))
  pulumi<3.0.0,>=2.20.0 (from pulumi-azure-native==0.9.0->-r <http://requirements.in|requirements.in> (line 3))

Can we expect new releases for these with updated dependencies soon?

rhythmic-actor-14991

04/19/2021, 1:31 PM

Copy code

const centralAlbAddress = centralIngress.status.apply(
    (status) => status.loadBalancer.ingress[0].hostname
);

worried-knife-31967

04/19/2021, 1:38 PM

I'm not sure if this was intentional or not... but using the pulumi github action as

@v2

the minimum CLI version is

2.25.0-alpha

. It seems strange the the v2 would require an alpha version of the SDK? I'm not sure whether this is github action semantics, but I'd expect

@v2

to be the latest stable version, not the latest experimental. This literally broke all my drift detections over the weekend 😠