pulumi-community #general

general

busy-umbrella-36067

10/30/2018, 4:05 PM

running into some issues with iam roles. preview and update break with that error, destroy and refresh work though

busy-umbrella-36067

10/30/2018, 4:05 PM

panic: interface conversion: interface {} is map[string]interface {}, not string
    goroutine 138 [running]:
    <http://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/vendor/github.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence.newAWSStringSet(0x28a5f80|github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/vendor/github.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence.newAWSStringSet(0x28a5f80>, 0xc420615a60, 0xc420615e00, 0x2, 0x2)
    	/home/travis/gopath/src/github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/vendor/github.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence/aws_policy_equivalence.go:386 +0x328
    <http://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/vendor/github.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence.(*awsPolicyStatement).equals(0xc420959c20|github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/vendor/github.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence.(*awsPolicyStatement).equals(0xc420959c20>, 0xc420959cb0, 0x0)
    	/home/travis/gopath/src/github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/vendor/github.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence/aws_policy_equivalence.go:176 +0x2e1
    <http://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/vendor/github.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence.(*awsPolicyDocument).equals(0xc420724a00|github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/vendor/github.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence.(*awsPolicyDocument).equals(0xc420724a00>, 0xc420724a80, 0x0)
    	/home/travis/gopath/src/github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/vendor/github.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence/aws_policy_equivalence.go:114 +0x109
    <http://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/vendor/github.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence.PoliciesAreEquivalent(0xc4204f3000|github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/vendor/github.com/jen20/awspolicyequivalence.PoliciesAreEquivalent(0xc4204f3000>, 0xf3, 0xc4207b4410, 0xc8, 0xc420adee10, 0xc420adee08, 0xc420adedf8)

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 4:35 PM

That’s… not good (especially since it’s in a library that Terraform uses with my name on it!)

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 4:35 PM

@busy-umbrella-36067 do you have a role which reproduces this?

busy-umbrella-36067

10/30/2018, 4:36 PM

@stocky-spoon-28903 im passing a promise to the statement instead of a string. I think thats triggering it

busy-umbrella-36067

10/30/2018, 4:36 PM

-.js

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 4:36 PM

Hmm, I’d think the pulumi engine should be dealing with that ok

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 4:37 PM

I don’t see where there would be a promise there - let me see if I can repro

busy-umbrella-36067

10/30/2018, 4:37 PM

bucket.arn

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 4:37 PM

Ahhh

busy-umbrella-36067

10/30/2018, 4:37 PM

pulumi creates the s3 bucket

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 4:37 PM

Yes, you’ll need:

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 4:38 PM

bucket.arn.apply(bucketArn => {
    return JSON.stringify({
        Version: "2012-10-17",
        Statement: [{
          Effect: "Allow",
          Action: [ "s3:ListBucket", "s3:HeadBucket", "s3:PutObject", "s3:GetObject" ],
          Resource: [ bucketArn ]
        }]
    });
});

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 4:39 PM

For the value of

policy

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 4:39 PM

It shouldn’t panic like that - but I think I know why it is

busy-umbrella-36067

10/30/2018, 4:39 PM

oh, that makes sense

busy-umbrella-36067

10/30/2018, 5:32 PM

important question: why is 🍹 the pulumi emoji?

orange-tailor-85423

10/30/2018, 5:48 PM

Pulumi configs - is there a way to store those values in a file/JSON and read them in?

orange-tailor-85423

10/30/2018, 5:48 PM

rather than "pulumi config set blah 4"

orange-tailor-85423

10/30/2018, 5:48 PM

so we can generalize the config.ts

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 5:48 PM

@busy-umbrella-36067 I think your panic gets ‘fixed’ by https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-terraform/pull/269 - in so much as it doesn’t panic any more, but gives the expected serialization error.

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 5:49 PM

You still need to do

apply

on the output required.

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 6:03 PM

@busy-umbrella-36067 If you remove the call to JSON.stringify (which must have available values) it behaves as you want though:

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 6:03 PM

-.js

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 6:03 PM

(That has some of the ceremony removed to make an easier repro, but correctly applies)

busy-umbrella-36067

10/30/2018, 6:05 PM

@stocky-spoon-28903 I was going off the examples repo, is there a reason

JSON

is used in those?

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 6:06 PM

Probably because they predate automatic serialization 🙂

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 6:06 PM

They should probably be updated

busy-umbrella-36067

10/30/2018, 6:07 PM

I’ll try it that way, I guess the role resource won’t need it either

stocky-spoon-28903

10/30/2018, 6:08 PM

That one actually does until the PR I linked earlier is merged