white-balloon-205
white-balloon-205
green-morning-1318
03/18/2020, 5:17 AMwhite-balloon-205
white-balloon-205
green-morning-1318
03/18/2020, 3:47 PMbrief-school-94535
03/18/2020, 11:18 PMgreen-morning-1318
03/18/2020, 11:44 PMgorgeous-egg-16927
03/19/2020, 3:42 AMbright-orange-69401
03/19/2020, 1:14 PMtall-librarian-49374
03/19/2020, 3:18 PMwhite-balloon-205
microscopic-pilot-97530
breezy-hamburger-69619
03/19/2020, 4:51 PMgentle-church-64629
03/19/2020, 4:52 PMfaint-table-42725
03/19/2020, 5:00 PMEditDirs
in ProgamTest
, which lets you apply multiple steps. So now Iām thinking the way this would work is you take an existing Pulumi application as the first step, then subsequent steps are additive updates to modify the resources. And the tests would occur within each step (or potentially ProgramTest
itself). But thinking through this, Iām not sure this is actually any kind of improvement over writing directly against the provider APIs. Thoughts on if this ergonomically seems useful? I do like the idea of the fact that with each step, the state of your infrastructure is quite clear (vs writing a bunch of API calls to modify resources).lemon-agent-27707
03/19/2020, 5:12 PMbrief-school-94535
03/19/2020, 5:53 PMbrief-school-94535
03/19/2020, 5:54 PMgreen-morning-1318
03/19/2020, 5:57 PMgreen-morning-1318
03/19/2020, 6:04 PMpulumi up
command is āhangingā? It doesnāt look like anything is happening šwhite-balloon-205
green-morning-1318
03/19/2020, 9:48 PMwhite-balloon-205
pulumi preview
errors in VS Code!gentle-diamond-70147
03/19/2020, 11:08 PMt3.medium
) and the total number of instances in my stack. Here's output with policy violations with "DEV" config. The same code passes with no violations with my "PROD" config that allows for different instance classes and more instances (in thread).faint-table-42725
03/19/2020, 11:42 PMProgramTest
working the way I would think youād want to do some kind of chaos testing. But I was trying it on the service stack, which has a decently long preview time, and Iām not sure this is how Iād want to actually do this type of testing in practice.big-piano-35669
package main
import (
"<http://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-kubernetes/sdk/go/kubernetes/yaml|github.com/pulumi/pulumi-kubernetes/sdk/go/kubernetes/yaml>"
"<http://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/sdk/go/pulumi|github.com/pulumi/pulumi/sdk/go/pulumi>"
)
func main() {
pulumi.Run(func(ctx *pulumi.Context) error {
_, err := yaml.NewConfigFile(ctx, "guestbook",
&yaml.ConfigFileArgs{File: "guestbook-all-in-one.yaml"},
)
return err
})
}
green-morning-1318
03/19/2020, 11:49 PMgreen-morning-1318
03/19/2020, 11:50 PMgentle-diamond-70147
03/19/2020, 11:59 PM