Am i misunderstanding aliases? A resource with

name="my-name"

shows no changes detected for

pulumi up

, yet that same resource with

opts=ResourceOptions(aliases=[Alias(name="my-name")]}

instead wants to do a "replace" based on a detected name change

Any Jupyter Notebook fans out here? I just created an example that embeds Pulumi into a Jupyter notebook, allowing interactive development/deployment of infrastructure resources alongside the code that uses it. https://github.com/pulumi/automation-api-examples/tree/main/python/pulumi_via_jupyter

Hi, I have some question about AWS ELB-EC2-RDS 3-tier architecture in VPC. I’m first at IaC, not good at aws, and my code should be refactored, but I need some helps and comprehensions about why my ELB(or VPC, or Web Server) is not working. https://github.com/SeongIkKim/pulumi-aws-3-tier/blob/master/__main__.py This is my code, and my ALB is not successful for health check and routing for my EC2 servers. When I get into ALB public dns, I see 502 BadGateway Error. I know that this question is quietly broad, but I can’t get it anyway. In my suspicion, there are some points. 1. ec2, LB security group. I don’t know how to attach my LB sg to ec2. (It was easy in console, but…) 2. VPC subnet is not well-structured, so My ALB is pointing some useless route..? 3. EC2 user data(simplehttp WAS setting) is not made. In 3rd, however, I can’t get logs because pulumi provises the instance without keypair. I’ve tried to get in ec2 with bastion host, but there is no public key in instance.

Hello! I've installed this specific Helm chart https://github.com/prometheus-community/helm-charts/tree/main/charts/kube-prometheus-stack using Pulumi.

SDK - python
Kubernetes - GKE
pulumi v2.20.0
pulumi-kubernetes==2.8.0

Pulumi installs 146 resources from that chart. After the installation every

pulumi preview

takes around 60-70 seconds. With the same resources, but without a helm chart it was around 10-13 seconds

gtime pulumi preview

61.36user 6.89system 1:05.35elapsed 104%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 389900maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (416major+501237minor)pagefaults 0swaps

gtime pulumi preview

13.97user 3.60system 0:16.07elapsed 109%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 132092maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (379major+404976minor)pagefaults 0swaps

I tried to analyse the debug log with max verbosity, but obviously I lack knowledge to identify what's wrong. Has anyone experienced performance degradation after installing helm charts? I need help identifying what's wrong, because now it is quite frustrating to wait for a while during each preview + update.

Hello! Does anyone know whether this is something being worked on or is on the roadmap anywhere? https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-vault/issues/10

HI! i think there's a problem with pulumi-python v2.21

File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/runtime/resource.py", line 358, in do_register
        resolver = await prepare_resource(res, ty, custom, props, opts)
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/runtime/resource.py", line 86, in prepare_resource
        serialized_props = await rpc.serialize_properties(props, property_dependencies_resources, res.translate_input_property)
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/runtime/rpc.py", line 78, in serialize_properties
        result = await serialize_property(v, deps, input_transformer)
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/runtime/rpc.py", line 199, in serialize_property
        value = await serialize_property(output.future(), deps, input_transformer)
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/runtime/rpc.py", line 185, in serialize_property
        future_return = await asyncio.ensure_future(awaitable)
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 116, in get_value
        val = await self._future
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 116, in get_value
        val = await self._future
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 116, in get_value
        val = await self._future
      [Previous line repeated 1 more time]
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 157, in run
        value = await self._future
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 382, in gather_futures
        return await asyncio.gather(*value_futures_list)
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 116, in get_value
        val = await self._future
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 178, in run
        transformed: Input[U] = func(value)
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 266, in from_input
        dict_items = [[k, Output.from_input(v)] for k, v in val.items()]
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 266, in <listcomp>
        dict_items = [[k, Output.from_input(v)] for k, v in val.items()]
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 272, in from_input
        list_items: List[Union[Any, Awaitable[Any], Output[Any]]] = [Output.from_input(v) for v in val]
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 272, in <listcomp>
        list_items: List[Union[Any, Awaitable[Any], Output[Any]]] = [Output.from_input(v) for v in val]
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 266, in from_input
        dict_items = [[k, Output.from_input(v)] for k, v in val.items()]
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 266, in <listcomp>
        dict_items = [[k, Output.from_input(v)] for k, v in val.items()]
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 274, in from_input
        output: Output[T] = cast(Output[T], Output.all(*list(list_items))) # type: ignore
      File "/usr/local/lib/python3.7/site-packages/pulumi/output.py", line 388, in all
        raise ValueError("Output.all() was supplied no inputs")
    ValueError: Output.all() was supplied no inputs
    error: an unhandled error occurred: Program exited with non-zero exit code: 1

It doesn't happen with pulumi==2.20.0 (tested with pulumi cli 2.14 and 2.21)

does this example works for someone? https://www.pulumi.com/docs/reference/pkg/aws/acm/certificate/#referencing-domain-validation-options-with-for-each-based-resources Looks really convoluted. I also tried just doing a:

for x in cert.domain_validation_options:
    # add record here

But seems like pulumi gets in an infinite loop

I may be able to help

one sec

this is highly specific, but should get you going:

self.resource = acm.Certificate(
            self.resource_name,
            domain_name=self.domain_name,
            validation_method="DNS",
            **self.options,
            opts=ResourceOptions(parent=self),
        )

        validation_records = []
        sans = self.options.get("subject_alternative_names", [])

        for idx, name in enumerate([self.domain_name] + sans):
            options = self.resource.domain_validation_options[idx]
            validation_records.append(
                self.validation_record(
                    name=name, options=options, declare_record=declare_record
                )
            )

        acm.CertificateValidation(
            self.resource_name,
            certificate_arn=self.resource.arn,
            validation_record_fqdns=validation_records,
            opts=ResourceOptions(parent=self),
        )

        export(f"acm.{self.domain_name}", self.resource.arn)

validation_record

method:

def validation_record(self, name, options, declare_record):
        return declare_record(
            resource_name=name,
            stack_name=self.stack_name,
            dns_name=options.resource_record_name,
            zone_id=self.route53_zone_id,
            type=options.resource_record_type,
            records=[options.resource_record_value],
            ttl=60,
            allow_overwrite=True,
            parent=self,
        ).fqdn

…which basically just calls

route53.Record

or whatever

thanks, will check it and test it

the prevoew works fine, maybe the example in the docs should be updated, but i have more questions. Why dows it returns an array of validation options? in which cases there is more that one item in that array?

SANs

each option represents one domain/fqdn

there’s an issue or two, let me find them

https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/issues/1201 / https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi/issues/5028

but since you probably know how many names you want in the cert, you can enumerate

Hello, everyone! Sorry, but i didn't find, how to create cloudfront using pulumi from scratch. Maybe someone can help me?

I’d like to write something like this for a stack output where an API changed the exported name between versions

try 
  output_value: str = stack.require_output("new_api_name")
except Error:
  output_value: str = stack.require_output("old_api_name")

I had an issue above when I tried this for a reference using “old_api_name”. How can I  write a python pulumi program that will behave as expected?

hello, I'm working on getting a kubernetes cluster deployed and found that there are two different packages to do it on aws with two different sets of options. One is pulumi_aws, the second is pulumi_eks, which also has more options. Why are there two packages and are there any differences between them I should know about?

Hi, im using Pulumi in python:

from pulumi.x import automation as auto
stack = auto.create_or_select_stack(stack_name=stack_name,
                                    project_name=project_name,
                                    program=pulumi_program)
resp = stack.preview()

this preview is without

--diff

, is it possible to use this with diff flag? Right now im changing this in

Python391\Lib\site-packages\pulumi\x\automation\_stack.py

def preview(self,
                parallel: Optional[int] = None,.....

from

args = ["preview"]

to

args = ["preview", "--diff"]

are there any examples of using integration tests in python?

is this only for golang right now?

Hey friendly people! Is there anywhere to get more info on these exceptions?

hello, is there a way to invoke

pulumi up

(or at least

pulumi preview

) from within a python interpreter? I am trying to get into a debugger

what’s up with the change from

get_ami

to

getAmi

? The former gives a deprecation warning but the latter raises an exception

with pulumi

v2.22.0

and pulumi-aws `3.32.2`:

File "/Users/scott/Library/Caches/pypoetry/virtualenvs/pulumi-stacks-6O2qUYd5-py3.9/lib/python3.9/site-packages/hatch_pulumi/aws/launch_template.py", line 37, in __attrs_post_init__
        self.ami = self.ami or ec2.getAmi(**self.ami_filter).id
    AttributeError: module 'pulumi_aws.ec2' has no attribute 'getAmi'
    error: an unhandled error occurred: Program exited with non-zero exit code: 1