Update from a previous post looks like there may be a bug wi

Question

Update from a previous post looks like there may be a bug with the pulumi aws classic package I create an aws classic provider then create a resource extending the pulumi ComponentResource class with a dependsOn option specifying that aws provider This should to my understanding require that the provider be provisioned before the componentResource However when I subsequently call aws ec2 getAmi within a function of that resource class explicitly specifying the provider I ve defined I get an `Unhandled exception Error Invoke Default provider for aws disabled aws ec2 getAmi getAmi must use an explicit provider` It appears that the provider has not been created at this point causing the getAmi call to fail because it attempts to use a default provider which I ve disabled Has anyone else observed behavior like this and if so is there some sort of workaround

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

Providers aren t provisioned You don t dependOn a provider Also that error is about the default provider the one you created is not the default provider it s an explicit one To use the provider you created pass it to the `provider` opt not the `dependsOn` opt

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

Ah okay And I did try passing the provider I created to the provider opt I get the same error

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

`const commonProviderArgs = ` `accessKey this awsConfig AWS ACCESS KEY ` `secretKey pulumi secret this awsConfig AWS SECRET KEY ` `assumeRole ` `externalId this awsConfig EXTERNAL ID ` `roleArn this awsConfig ROLE ARN ` ` ` ` ` `const awsClassicProvider = new awsClassic Provider aws classic test ` ` commonProviderArgs ` `region us east 2 ` ` ` `const awsFix = new AwsFixtureComponent fix baseName fix configuration awsConfig awsClassicProvider providers awsClassicProvider ` `awsFix` ` initialize ` ` then fix = gt ` `return fix ` ` ` ` catch err = gt ` `log error err ` ` ` `return awsFix `

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

`const fixtureAmi = await aws ec2` ` getAmi ` `filters ` ` ` `name name ` `values ubuntu images hvm ssd ubuntu jammy 22 04 amd64 server ` ` ` ` ` `mostRecent true ` ` ` ` provider this provider ` ` ` ` then invoke = gt invoke id `

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

The first chunk of code is creating the resource i e AwsFixtureComponent and in that constructor I set its provider to the one passed in The second chunk is within a function initialize in that class and that s where I see the error

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

This is still your error gt Default provider for aws disabled aws ec2 getAmi getAmi must use an explicit provider If you re getting this error then the problem is the call to `getAmi ` Since you have disabled default providers which is good imo you need to pass a provider to every call to AWS This error is saying you haven t passed the provider to the call to `getAmi `

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

Yea that s still my error and I pass the provider to the getAmi call which is why I m confused

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

Are you calling getAmi elsewhere

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

No that s the only place

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

Where are you setting `this provider` Could it be null or undefined

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

I have a few other questions too ``` const awsFix = new AwsFixtureComponent fix baseName fix configuration awsConfig awsClassicProvider providers awsClassicProvider ``` The question here is

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

This is pretty weird too ` then invoke = gt invoke id `

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

Happy to help translate to more idiomatic code if that d be useful

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

I set it in the constructor And yea that call is a little messy because I ve been oscillating between passing the provider directly and trying to set it by passing it as the providers opt And the ` then invoke = gt invoke id ` I pulled from a pulumi template <https github com pulumi templates blob master vm aws typescript index ts>

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

And sure thank you I can also tidy it up real quick and re send

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

Ah I think that template code predates `getAmiOutput ` You can now use `getAmiOutput id` which is more idiomatic Also you might store the AMI object in the variable since that s more flexible and get the id only when you need it passing it into the EC2 constructor

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

Re the messy constructor use ComponentResource Follow the Pulumi model Providers get passed only via the `provider` or `providers` opts

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

gotcha okay thanks I just implemented those changes and removed the invoke for now and I m still getting the same error I assume it s because that provider is still undefined by the time the getAmi call is made Is there a way to ensure that provider is created before the getAmi call is made Maybe an apply

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

I tried an apply and it didn t work maybe I m not implementing it correctly here s the call `pulumi all awsClassicProvider apply awsProvider = gt ` `const awsFix = new AwsFixtureComponent fix baseName fix provider awsProvider ` `awsFix` ` initialize ` ` then fix = gt ` `return fix ` ` ` ` catch err = gt ` `log error err ` ` ` `return awsFix ` ` `

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

and the constructor `export class AwsFixtureComponent extends pulumi ComponentResource ` `public readonly fixture AwsFixture ` `public readonly provider aws Provider ` `public readonly opts pulumi ComponentResourceOptions | undefined ` `constructor name string fixture AwsFixture opts pulumi ComponentResourceOptions ` `super fixtures awsFixture name opts ` `this fixture = fixture ` `this provider = this opts provider as aws Provider ` `this opts=opts ` ` `

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

No Providers are simple objects they aren t in any way async

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

ah

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

okay nevermind

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

So why would it be undefined a few times then defined

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

This looks problematic `this provider = this opts provider as aws Provider ` You re not detecting a missing provider

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

Replace the ` ` with ` ` see where it s undefined

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

And ensure the definition for provider is `const provider aws Provider ` That ll barf sooner too

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

It s undefined in the constructor

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

When I had the ` ` there it was undefined twice before being defined

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

I ve been console logging the values of `provider` and `opts` right before making the getAmi call

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

Screenshot from 2023 05 24 18 36 45 png

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

I m not sure how that s happening though since there shouldn t be any async behavior

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

When I replace with ` ` it fails in the constructor trying to read properties of undefined

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

That s weird It shouldn t Can you post an MCVE somewhere so that I can try it

damp-lock-9822 · Answer

Do you have aws creds you can use

little-cartoon-10569 · Answer

Yep