This message was deleted.
# general
s
This message was deleted.
👋 1
s
This is a total hack and I haven't tested if it actually works as a workaround, and even if it did work it's not something I'd recommend, but: What if you make the value you want to ignore a Stack Output and instead of using IgnoreChanges, you have a ternary that computes "if this should be ignored, instead use value from the Stack Output from this Stack itself (self-referential StackReferences are possible), but otherwise use the new computed value.
🤯 1
s
wooow, I'd never think of that. But even if it works, I don't think it's very practical - we have ~30 resources being affected by this, hahah
😵‍💫 1