This message was deleted.
s
This message was deleted.
e
I'm not totally up to scratch with the current thinking around this, but it's something that's been discussed a lot internally. Doing it in a way that maintains our backwards compatibility seems to be very hard, so it hasn't happened yet but we are interested in solving this.
g
i’ve seen some of the related gh issues (including [0]) … and i think the NodeNext module resolution (with typescript@next) may not require any significant change in the current codebase… basically what i’d propose is to only support javascript, and provide a template that has typescript config. https://github.com/audacioustux/sdp/tree/8f49271fc5ff11cea2150181cbc32404818948c0/bootstrap here for example, i had to explicitly turn of pulumi typescript support (in Pulumi.yaml)… though by “backward compatibility” you may mean a different thing - that i’m misunderstanding. [0] https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/49083#issuecomment-1435399267
m
also the official kubernetes-typescript template needs to be updated to use pulumi/kubernetes v4
This actually just merged this morning! So should be available now.
🙌 2