No matter how you like to participate in developer communities, Pulumi wants to meet you there. If you want to meet other Pulumi users to share use-cases and best practices, contribute code or documentation, see us at an event, or just tell a story about something cool you did with Pulumi, you are part of our community.

Pulumi Community

```			await workspace.createStack(stackName);
			await workspace.selectStack(stackName);
			const stack = await workspace.stack();```
I'm able to create a stack, select it, and get a summary about it if it is an instance but I don't see how to effect the state of it to do a stack up or down

image.png

`await workspace.stack()` returns a StackSummary type

Whereas something like `const stack = await LocalWorkspace.createOrSelectStack(localProgramArgs, workspaceArgs);` would return a Stack type

<@U05H5MXPJJX> thank you for the reply.  Are there methods to take an instance of a stack and do an `.up()` with it, or is this only available using the static methods `LocalWorkspace`

I've myself have been only dabbling with the Pulumi automation API. As far as I know, the `up()` method exists on the `Stack` type objects. So something like this should work:
```const stack = await workspace.selectStack(stackName);
await stack.up();```

I think using the static method this would work, but for an instance `.selectStack` returns a `void` with typescript

That's why I'm guessing I'm misunderstanding some sort of design choice

it's like if you have an instance of a workspace the expectation seems to be that you'd `await` all your operations but don't expect a response

Yeah I found it to be a little strange as well. Ultimately I ended up representing "instances" of `workspace` as `WorkspaceArgs`. I.e:
```  const workspaceArgs: LocalWorkspaceOptions = {
    workDir: infraDir,
    envVars: {
      PULUMI_K8S_ENABLE_PATCH_FORCE: 'true',
      NODE_OPTIONS: '',
    },
  };```

I also see there is some option to supply a callback, maybe the idea is I do things  more `async` and hit a callback

I like your approach I'll probably do that