https://pulumi.com
Join Slack
Anyone get this while trying to access the Output of the ObjectMetaArgs on a CustomResource object m...
# python
g
Anyone get this while trying to access the Output of the ObjectMetaArgs on a CustomResource object metadata property?
Copy code
AttributeError: 'dict' object has no attribute 'name'
Any other resource type seems to return a proper Output[T], but this one returns a dictionary for the 
metadata
property.
h
in azure, I usually see this when i call a 
get_foo_output()
function--the inner structures on their return tends to be dictionaries instead of objects for some reason
g
this is the k8s provider
This feels like a bug.. this is the closest thing I can find: https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-kubernetes/issues/1860 but it's not that... what's weird is autonaming works fine...
Copy code
nodeclasses["general"] = k8s.apiextensions.CustomResource(
        "general",
        api_version="karpenter.k8s.aws/v1beta1",
        kind="EC2NodeClass",
        metadata=k8s.meta.v1.ObjectMetaArgs(
            annotations=COMMON_ANNOTATIONS | {"<http://pulumi.com/patchForce|pulumi.com/patchForce>": "true"},
            labels=COMMON_LABELS,
        ),
I would have expected when I reference it, 
nodeclasses["general"].metadata.name
, for it to be of type 
ObjectMetaArgs
and have access th the Output property, 
name
. Instead I'm presented with a 'dict'.
🤷
this breaks my unit testing, because I can't lift the property properly, and now I'll have to do some stupid guard check in my code to trap 
KeyError
on it
h
yeah, i wonder if some of the pulumi codegen isn't precise about objects vs dicts
g
Copy code
@property
    @pulumi.getter
    def metadata(self) -> pulumi.Output['_meta.v1.outputs.ObjectMeta']:
        """
        Standard object's metadata. More info: <https://git.k8s.io/community/contributors/devel/sig-architecture/api-conventions.md#metadata>
        """
        return pulumi.get(self, "metadata")
so I checked the Namespace, and it imp lements this
but 
CustomResource
does not...
this feels like a strange oversight with the codegen for Python but I could be wrong.
I guess I could just extend from CustomResource and implement the method myself for now to save my sanity.
11 Views
Open in Slack
PreviousNext
Powered by

Pulumi Community

No matter how you like to participate in developer communities, Pulumi wants to meet you there. If you want to meet other Pulumi users to share use-cases and best practices, contribute code or documentation, see us at an event, or just tell a story about something cool you did with Pulumi, you are part of our community.

Powered by