Hey guys, I want to use the wafV2 package but the configuration seems to be off... when implementing the

visibilityConfig: pulumi.Input<aws.types.input.wafv2.WebAclRuleVisibilityConfig>

as

visibilityConfig: {
                cloudWatchMetricsEnabled: true,
                metricName: 'DefaultRateLimit',
                sampledRequestsEnabled: true,
              },

Which is strange because the source provides the following exported interface:

export interface wafv2.WebAclRuleVisibilityConfig {     
                           cloudwatchMetricsEnabled: pulumi.Input<boolean>     
                           metricName: pulumi.Input<string>     
                           sampledRequestsEnabled: pulumi.Input<boolean> 
                    }

I see the error ->

Object literal may only specify known properties, and cloudWatchMetricsEnabled does not exist in type Input<WebAclRuleVisibilityConfig>

Also while referring to the AWS documentation, It supports my current implementation: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/waf/latest/APIReference/API_VisibilityConfig.html

It's

cloudwatch

not

cloudWatch

can you try

cloudwatchMetricsEnabled

with w lowercase? maybe that's it

See https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pulumi/pulumi-aws/master/sdk/nodejs/types/input.ts

ha kilian beat me to it 😄

For some reason, it's missing in the docs: https://www.pulumi.com/registry/packages/aws/api-docs/wafv2/webacl/#webaclrulevisibilityconfig is used as an anchor link but leads to nowhere

That was it 🤦‍♂️ thank you for that!! Yeah, I still was confused as it wasnt in the documentation. Just a typo though thank you!

hmmm yeah, that's not right; it should be in the docs

I tried to see if there was a change recently, but the types file is so large that GitHub doesn't render it and it's not possible to browse the history

oho:

Note: There are over 200 nested types for this resource. Only the first 200 types are included in this documentation.

Looks like the entirety of the product is exposed as one a few giant resources 😉

They say, Security is Hard. Apparently, laying out Security configuration files is Hard, too.