faint-elephant-30784
01/24/2025, 1:02 PMmagnificent-eve-10499
01/24/2025, 3:24 PMfaint-elephant-30784
01/27/2025, 2:14 PMmagnificent-eve-10499
01/29/2025, 4:55 PMfaint-elephant-30784
01/30/2025, 11:13 AMfaint-elephant-30784
01/30/2025, 11:24 AMmodern-zebra-45309
01/30/2025, 12:22 PMfaint-elephant-30784
01/30/2025, 12:23 PMmodern-zebra-45309
01/30/2025, 12:24 PMget))
a configuration value.faint-elephant-30784
01/30/2025, 12:24 PMmodern-zebra-45309
01/30/2025, 12:27 PMpulumi.Config().get("num_nodes", 12)
not replacing the default "12" with your desired value?faint-elephant-30784
01/30/2025, 12:27 PMfaint-elephant-30784
01/30/2025, 12:27 PMfaint-elephant-30784
01/30/2025, 12:28 PMmodern-zebra-45309
01/30/2025, 12:28 PMfaint-elephant-30784
01/30/2025, 12:28 PMfaint-elephant-30784
01/30/2025, 12:29 PMmodern-zebra-45309
01/30/2025, 12:34 PM<http://variables.tf|variables.tf>
but integrates it into the program code. But in my mind (and in the way I use it) it's the same. In both TF and Pulumi I have to decide ahead of time which properties of a resource I want the user to be able to change. The user can then create a tfvars file or set the stack configuration to adjust these values as they please.modern-zebra-45309
01/30/2025, 12:35 PMmagnificent-eve-10499
01/31/2025, 2:14 AMconfig.yaml
or centralized in the ESC config.
What I am trying to understand here is how can I leverage what you have created in a way that improves on this workflow.