https://pulumi.com
Join Slack
This message was deleted.
# azure
s
This message was deleted.
b
I would, but I'm not certain I can create a shareable variant that can reproduce the behavior.. the network setup as it is right now is slightly sensitive and I'm not certain I've got the authority to share the composition 😉 If I have time i'll create a generic version that reproduces the issue and submit that at some point - I presumed there was a retry, just found it strange that I had this happen three times in a row (though on two different subnets, so I guess i'm perpetually unlucky with this at the moment).
In other news, this might just be the perfect excuse for me to get in to the whole automation-api side of things 😄
Any thoughts on what the "storage X account could not be could not be created because storage account X was not found" issue is all about? happened at least twice, not certain I can reproduce it every time yet.
t
You can also turn full logging on that will capture raw HTTP requests. If you can share those (obfuscated), we can find the cause.
No, I haven’t seen this error before
b
excellent - I'll turn that on the next time I rebuild and hopefully we'll catch it 😉
t
It’s something like 
pulumi up -v=9 --debug --logflow --logtostderr
b
yup, seen those flags somewhere - I'll get to them. so far only run traces (and that's awesome by the way, thanks for including that!)
Sorry for bringing this up again.. I just hit on this problem twice again while trying to recreate the environment (so i destroyed it all again, then brought up the RG and KeyVault, and hit apply again - same thing happened).. so I did another wipe down to rg+keyvault state, and decided to log it. Now it didn't happen 😕
The reaason why i'm mentioning htis is that I feel it might actually be a race condition issue - and the fact of debuglogging might have slowed it down enough to avoid it?
@tall-librarian-49374 - would it be possible for me to send you the output of the log more directly? I've finally reproduced it cleanly by trying to up a new resource group with only network components in it. I can send you the code I use as well if need be - but it does show the "anotherOperationInProgress" issue:
Copy code
<{%reset%}>)
I0325 09:02:09.325742    6864 eventsink.go:78] eventSink::Infoerr(<{%reset%}>  "error": {
<{%reset%}>)
 +  pulumi:pulumi:Stack baseline-infra-dev.infra.infratesting creating X-Ms-Arm-Service-Request-Id: 85df7794-e50f-456e-b26f-b38ee3932adc
I0325 09:02:09.325742    6864 eventsink.go:78] eventSink::Infoerr(<{%reset%}>    "code": "AnotherOperationInProgress",
<{%reset%}>)
 +  pulumi:pulumi:Stack baseline-infra-dev.infra.infratesting creating X-Ms-Correlation-Request-Id: 4277e52d-a5f0-4891-98c7-566c8fd5c8f5
I0325 09:02:09.325742    6864 eventsink.go:78] eventSink::Infoerr(<{%reset%}>    "message": "Another operation on this or dependent resource is in progress. To retrieve status of the operation use uri: <https://management.azure.com/subscriptions/><redacted>/providers/Microsoft.Network/locations/westeurope/operations/8974f472-6871-4414-817a-fd8a78038cb1?api-version=2020-08-01.",
<{%reset%}>)
I0325 09:02:09.326304    6864 eventsink.go:78] eventSink::Infoerr(<{%reset%}>    "details": []
<{%reset%}>)
I0325 09:02:09.326365    6864 eventsink.go:78] eventSink::Infoerr(<{%reset%}>  }
t
sure, send it to mikhail@pulumi.com
b
thanks!
would you mind if i zip them? any preference between .zip or .7z?
t
Got your email, thank you
2 Views
Open in Slack
PreviousNext
Powered by

Pulumi Community

No matter how you like to participate in developer communities, Pulumi wants to meet you there. If you want to meet other Pulumi users to share use-cases and best practices, contribute code or documentation, see us at an event, or just tell a story about something cool you did with Pulumi, you are part of our community.

Powered by