This message was deleted Pulumi Community #general

Join Slack

This message was deleted.

# general

sparse-intern-71089

10/31/2018, 9:05 PM

This message was deleted.

white-balloon-205

10/31/2018, 9:51 PM

Looks like

version

is currently required, but probably shouldn't be as Helm doesn't require the version. Opened https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-kubernetes/issues/255 to track, and you can should be able to work around in the meantime by passing

version: <any>undefined

early-musician-41645

10/31/2018, 10:13 PM

I think I saw an issue on this already, but is there a way for the chart deployments to do an

upgrade --install

instead of an

install

? meaning, if something already exists in kubernetes then we just ignore it as if we were doing

helm upgrade -i

early-musician-41645

10/31/2018, 10:13 PM

Right now I'm getting an error when running my chart deployment:

Copy code

Updating (poc):

     Type                                  Name                  Status                  Info
     pulumi:pulumi:Stack                   eks-cluster-poc
 +   ├─ kubernetes:helm.sh:Chart           aws-k8s-cni           created
 +   │  └─ kubernetes:core:ServiceAccount  kube-system/aws-node  **creating failed**     1 error
 ~   └─ kubernetes:helm.sh:Chart           splunk-forwarder      updated                 [diff: -version]

Diagnostics:
  kubernetes:core:ServiceAccount (kube-system/aws-node):
    error: Plan apply failed: serviceaccounts "aws-node" already exists

early-musician-41645

10/31/2018, 10:13 PM

helm just says

unchanged

and does a no-op

early-musician-41645

10/31/2018, 10:14 PM

but pulumi is erroring out

white-balloon-205

10/31/2018, 10:24 PM

@early-musician-41645 Is it the case here that you already have this installed separately from your Pulumi program, but then want the Pulumi program to indicate it wants to install it as well, and for that to succeed if it's already there (presumably updating it if needed to the state specified by the Pulumi program)? Any reason you want to specify it again here if it already available? In general (for all cloud providers not just Kubernetes) we tend to encourage a pattern of using

.get

to look up a resource if already there, instead of attempting to recreate it. I suspect there's a reason why that doesn't make sense in your scenario, but curious to understand more.

early-musician-41645

10/31/2018, 10:26 PM

No, I think you're right - this was created outside of Pulumi. Do you have a

.get

example I can use?

white-balloon-205

10/31/2018, 10:34 PM

Copy code

import * as k8s  from "@pulumi/kubernetes";

const serviceaccount = k8s.core.v1.ServiceAccount.get("aws-node", "kube-system/aws-node");
export const serviceaccountSercrets = serviceaccount.secrets;

white-balloon-205

10/31/2018, 10:35 PM

(actually - not 100% sure that's the right second argument to pass - but I think it is - I don't have a cluster available right now with that service account to try this out on)

2 Views

Open in Slack

Previous Next