No matter how you like to participate in developer communities, Pulumi wants to meet you there. If you want to meet other Pulumi users to share use-cases and best practices, contribute code or documentation, see us at an event, or just tell a story about something cool you did with Pulumi, you are part of our community.

Pulumi Community

Cc <@UB9JVTW07> who probably has thoughts on what’s best currently, and what we might add in the future to make some of these common patterns simpler. 

i'm missing context.... but `pulumi.output({http, https})` should work.

it will give you an `Output&lt;{http: Unwrapped..., https: Unwrapped...}&gt;`

`http` has type `Output&lt;Listener&gt;` though

<@UB9JVTW07> see the thread of questions leading up to this in the channel for context.

can you supply a gist? i'd like to examine first hand.  Thanks!

looking closely at the original post, i'd just repeat my first claim.  specifically i *think* `pulumi.output({http, https})` will give you what you want.

it will give you the `Output&lt;{http: ..., https: ...}&gt;` type you are asking for

but i can't say for certain without having a gist to try out :slightly_smiling_face:

if you find that it doesn't work, def let me know and i'll investigate right away :slightly_smiling_face:

Terrific!  While it's not a 100% replacement, pulumi.output is now the general purpose replacement for pulumi.all

it generally has the strictly better behavior that you want most of the time.

pulumi.all is more like a 'shallow' unwrapping of your value.  while pulumi.output is a 'deep' unwrapping

most of hte time the latter is more appropriate.

yeh i see that it seems to cove most case

cooll i didnt know about it - thanks a bunch

one downside is simply that we're really exploiting some very complex TypeScript features. so sometimes when it doesn't do what you want... the error messages can be a bit... daunting :slightly_smiling_face:

BTW I love using all these higher-order types in real code - awesome API you guys have

Awesome to hear.  We like it too :slightly_smiling_face:

I once got GHC to produce  a 9k line error message so I'm not too nervous haha

You wouldn't happen to have a copy of that?  I'd love to see it :smile: