What I really wanted was `pulumi all http https Output lt ht

Question

What I really wanted was `pulumi all http https Output lt http https gt `

white-balloon-205 · Answer

Cc < lemon spoon 91807> who probably has thoughts on what s best currently and what we might add in the future to make some of these common patterns simpler

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

i m missing context but `pulumi output http https ` should work

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

it will give you an `Output lt http Unwrapped https Unwrapped gt `

hundreds-musician-51496 · Answer

`http` has type `Output lt Listener gt ` though

white-balloon-205 · Answer

< lemon spoon 91807> see the thread of questions leading up to this in the channel for context

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

can you supply a gist i d like to examine first hand Thanks

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

looking closely at the original post i d just repeat my first claim specifically i think `pulumi output http https ` will give you what you want

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

it will give you the `Output lt http https gt ` type you are asking for

hundreds-musician-51496 · Answer

Ok let me try it

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

but i can t say for certain without having a gist to try out slightly smiling face

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

if you find that it doesn t work def let me know and i ll investigate right away slightly smiling face

hundreds-musician-51496 · Answer

yeh that seesm to work thank you

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

Terrific While it s not a 100 replacement pulumi output is now the general purpose replacement for pulumi all

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

it generally has the strictly better behavior that you want most of the time

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

pulumi all is more like a shallow unwrapping of your value while pulumi output is a deep unwrapping

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

most of hte time the latter is more appropriate

hundreds-musician-51496 · Answer

yeh i see that it seems to cove most case

hundreds-musician-51496 · Answer

cooll i didnt know about it thanks a bunch

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

one downside is simply that we re really exploiting some very complex TypeScript features so sometimes when it doesn t do what you want the error messages can be a bit daunting slightly smiling face

hundreds-musician-51496 · Answer

BTW I love using all these higher order types in real code awesome API you guys have

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

you re welcome have a good day

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

Awesome to hear We like it too slightly smiling face

hundreds-musician-51496 · Answer

I once got GHC to produce a 9k line error message so I m not too nervous haha

lemon-spoon-91807 · Answer

You wouldn t happen to have a copy of that I d love to see it smile

hundreds-musician-51496 · Answer

hehe sadly no it was a long time ago