What I would not expect is for it to fail with a n...
# general
e
What I would not expect is for it to fail with a name already exists, then if you change the name it fails to understand the old cluster is still there and doesn't do a proper replace
g
Can you file an issue? That sounds like a bug
i
I think it’s the kind of things that needs the
deleteBeforeReplace: true
option. And I’m not sure whether doing it transparently for resources is a good idea or not. But yeah, it’d be great if there will be some notification about it during the preview
e
yes that does resolve it