https://pulumi.com logo
#general
Title
# general
q

quick-action-34599

08/26/2019, 8:29 PM
I did search through the github releases and changelog but didn’t see anything about upgrade steps
w

white-balloon-205

08/26/2019, 8:31 PM
There should be very few changes between
0.18.x
and
1.0-beta
versions, so it is very much not expected that moving to these versions would propose significant changes. Can you share details on what versions you migrated from and to and what unexpected diffs you saw? Either here or in a GitHub issue?
q

quick-action-34599

08/26/2019, 8:32 PM
yea one sec
Copy code
@pulumi/aws 0.18.1 -> 1.0.0-beta.2
@pulumi/awsx 0.18.0 -> 0.18.8
@pulumi/cloud 0.18.0 -> 0.18.1
@pulumi/gcp 0.18.5 -> 1.0.0-beta.1
@pulumi/pulumi 0.17.1 -> 1.0.0-beta.4
whoops one sec
here’s the preview output
(names redacted)
My concern, other than it just not working, is that it’s trying to create resources that already exist, and then wants to delete them?
w

white-balloon-205

08/26/2019, 8:46 PM
Yes - this does look concerning. Would you mind opening an issue so we can have someone look into it further? Note that I believe the issue here is going to be related to this upgrade
@pulumi/awsx 0.18.0 -> 0.18.8
not the beta upgrades themselves. That's updating though 6 months of changes to that library - from a very early version of that library before it was initially launched. Still - we would not expect this level of churn and it will be useful to understand what the root issue is here.
m

microscopic-florist-22719

08/26/2019, 8:51 PM
@quick-action-34599 what happens if you revert the update to
@pulumi/awsx
but leave the others intact?
And were there any code changes you needed to make when updating?
q

quick-action-34599

08/26/2019, 8:52 PM
@microscopic-florist-22719 going to try that now
no, no syntax errors. I upgraded so I could use the
import
property on CustomResourceOptions
👍 1
A full removal of node_modules and revert to prior versions has the same behavior
m

microscopic-florist-22719

08/26/2019, 9:33 PM
Prior versions of all packages, or just
@pulumi/awsx
?
q

quick-action-34599

08/26/2019, 9:59 PM
all packages
Going to try just that one
No joy, same result
m

microscopic-florist-22719

08/26/2019, 10:38 PM
Hm. It's really surprising that rolling back doesn't solve the issue. Let's take this to DM
q

quick-action-34599

08/26/2019, 11:03 PM
thanks