This message was deleted.
# general
s
This message was deleted.
t
Hi Damian. Thanks for the feedback! > The expectation is that the .net program should be spawning the pulumi "engine" and not the other way around. There are several things to discuss here - would you mind opening an issue so that we could go in more depth? > I want to do other things in my program as part of deployment such as a db migration Likely, this should be another resource in Pulumi model. Are you familar with the concept of dynamic providers (not yet supported for .NET)? > I want to use this to define resources of my own services Similar to the last point, this should be a Pulumi provider then.