This message was deleted Pulumi Community #general

Join Slack

This message was deleted.

# general

sparse-intern-71089

10/12/2020, 10:24 PM

This message was deleted.

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 10:25 PM

This was in my “Changes” tab:

Copy code

Type                           Name                                                       Operation
~   pulumi:pulumi:Stack            <PROJECT-NAME>-<STACK-NAME>                                          refreshed

little-cartoon-10569

10/12/2020, 10:28 PM

What's your backend? Maybe you're creating a new stack in a state file that already has the same stack in it?

little-cartoon-10569

10/12/2020, 10:28 PM

I got that (or something very similar) when I created two StackReferences for the same stack (instead of creating one and passing it to both places).

billowy-army-68599

10/12/2020, 10:29 PM

@wet-soccer-72485 what are you deploying? a helm chart?

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 10:52 PM

@little-cartoon-10569 I tried only calling

getStack

and

getProject

once in my project because I can’t think of where else I’d be creating StackReferences (maybe some function I am unaware of). I’ll look around for other possible StackReferences..

little-cartoon-10569

10/12/2020, 10:53 PM

I think StackReferences are always created manually, if you don't think you're doing it, then you're not. Must be something else..

👍 1

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 10:53 PM

@billowy-army-68599 Nope, not a helm chart. I am however deploying a set of kubernetes assets and GCP infra

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 10:53 PM

@little-cartoon-10569 got it thanks..

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 10:54 PM

My backend btw is just Pulumi @little-cartoon-10569 to answer your first question.

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 10:54 PM

(Unless I’ve forgotten and I am actually using a GCP bucket or something else… I’ll check)

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 10:56 PM

The underlying issue beyond the URN seems to be this (i did not notice before because I was in the “changes” tab in pulumi cloud):

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 10:56 PM

Copy code

Error: Only one root Pulumi Stack may be active at once
		at Stack.<anonymous> (/home/runner/work/<repo-name>/<repo-name>/node_modules/@pulumi/pulumi/runtime/stack.js:79:23)
		at Generator.next (<anonymous>)
		at fulfilled (/home/runner/work/<repo-name>/<repo-name>/node_modules/@pulumi/pulumi/runtime/stack.js:18:58)
		at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:97:5)
error: Running program '/home/runner/work/<repo-name>/<repo-name>' failed with an unhandled exception:
Error: Only one root Pulumi Stack may be active at once
		at Stack.<anonymous> (/home/runner/work/<repo-name>/<repo-name>/node_modules/@pulumi/pulumi/runtime/stack.js:79:23)
		at Generator.next (<anonymous>)
		at fulfilled (/home/runner/work/<repo-name>/<repo-name>/node_modules/@pulumi/pulumi/runtime/stack.js:18:58)
		at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:97:5)
error: Running program '/home/runner/work/<repo-name>/<repo-name>' failed with an unhandled exception:
Error: Only one root Pulumi Stack may be active at once
		at Stack.<anonymous> (/home/runner/work/<repo-name>/<repo-name>/node_modules/@pulumi/pulumi/runtime/stack.js:79:23)
		at Generator.next (<anonymous>)
		at fulfilled (/home/runner/work/<repo-name>/<repo-name>/node_modules/@pulumi/pulumi/runtime/stack.js:18:58)
		at processTicksAndRejections (internal/process/task_queues.js:97:5)

little-cartoon-10569

10/12/2020, 10:57 PM

That's weird. Are you calling

runInPulumiStack()

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 10:59 PM

…Yes.

little-cartoon-10569

10/12/2020, 11:00 PM

Ah. That's test code. Shouldn't be calling that in a Pulumi application (afaik).

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 11:00 PM

Sounds like maybe I have failed to properly use

runInPulumiStack()

😂 (partial tears for joy if this is it)

little-cartoon-10569

10/12/2020, 11:00 PM

It can be useful in unit tests sometimes, but I don't think it should be used in projects.

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 11:01 PM

Roger that.

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 11:01 PM

Thanks, I’m going to push this up and see if things start working again 🙂

🤞 1

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 11:07 PM

Yup! That was it @little-cartoon-10569. Thank you!

🍾 2

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 11:07 PM

Thank you @billowy-army-68599 for helping as well!

wet-soccer-72485

10/12/2020, 11:07 PM

🍾

6 Views

Open in Slack

Previous Next