This message was deleted.
s
This message was deleted.
w
s
that’s correct. Even when I do it that way, it creates a few security groups + rules
w
And the security groups it creates are no good in some way? The opinionated nature of awsx means it will create resources it needs to provide the lower-friction experience. If those security groups are problematic, then you’ll want to use the base
aws
provider and for reusability purposes, probably do so with a custom resource based on
aws
that sets things up the way you want them to be set up.
s
Yeah, I think it was a mistake to use
awsx
if I already had an existing cluster that was created by
aws
. But I would have expected
.get()
not to modify the existing cluster config. Though it makes sense why it does that…
seems that
awsx
is kind of all-or-nothing that way