full-artist-27215
05/18/2021, 3:07 PM"grant-<ROLE_NAME>-permissions-on-X"
. Resources don't expose their logical name directly, but do expose them (at least in Python) with a "private" property _name
. The information seems to always be available (since Resource names are strings, and not pulumi.Output[str]
, so it seems "safe" from that perspective, at least). Will I be sent to Programmer Jail for doing this? Is there any thought to formally exposing the logical resource name as an officially blessed read-only property that we can use to generate additional names (or is there already a way to do this that I've missed)? Thanks 🙇No matter how you like to participate in developer communities, Pulumi wants to meet you there. If you want to meet other Pulumi users to share use-cases and best practices, contribute code or documentation, see us at an event, or just tell a story about something cool you did with Pulumi, you are part of our community.
Powered by