This message was deleted.

sparse-intern-71089

10/14/2021, 6:58 PM

This message was deleted.

little-cartoon-10569

10/14/2021, 7:11 PM

That would rollback the stack, not the provider. So resources that Pulumi created would not be managed by Pulumi. That sounds like a worse situation to me.

little-cartoon-10569

10/14/2021, 7:11 PM

I would roll forward only.

👍 2

little-cartoon-10569

10/14/2021, 7:13 PM

You could do it automatically via

git revert

, which would put new commits that cause the code to return to its previous shape, then

up

that.

little-cartoon-10569

10/14/2021, 7:14 PM

But I have never found that to be necessary. Generally, if you make a mistake, it gets caught in your first environment, you resolve it in a roll-forward manner, and it never goes any further.

high-morning-17948

10/14/2021, 11:52 PM

Thats true, I currenlty have three env. Dev, Staging and Prod. I've been doing roll forward.

high-morning-17948

10/14/2021, 11:57 PM

Thanks for the response. Based on your input, I should stay with the roll forward approach.

high-morning-17948

10/14/2021, 11:58 PM

@little-cartoon-10569 Thanks!

45 Views

Open in Slack

Previous Next

Pulumi Community

No matter how you like to participate in developer communities, Pulumi wants to meet you there. If you want to meet other Pulumi users to share use-cases and best practices, contribute code or documentation, see us at an event, or just tell a story about something cool you did with Pulumi, you are part of our community.