This message was deleted.
# generals
sparse-intern-71089
12/22/2021, 4:40 PMThis message was deleted.
p
prehistoric-activity-61023
12/22/2021, 5:58 PMif you see updates to provider resource only, that’s the expected behavior
prehistoric-activity-61023
12/22/2021, 6:00 PMactually, let me take a look into that, I think I’m gonna have the same upgrade in one of my projects
prehistoric-activity-61023
12/22/2021, 6:19 PMIn my case, it wants to create replacements for each Record resource, too. Although the only change is additional
allowOverwritefalseprehistoric-activity-61023
12/22/2021, 6:24 PMIn my case, the URN of the provider doesn’t change (although its version is altered but that’s understandable).
@victorious-cat-95191
Do you use default provider configuration or do you create an explicit provider instance within pulumi code?
prehistoric-activity-61023
12/22/2021, 6:25 PM(it should not affect the discussed case but I want to know if your case is related to #186 or it’s something else and should be reported separately)
v
victorious-cat-95191
12/22/2021, 8:31 PM@prehistoric-activity-61023 It's trying to replace all of the Record resources (sorry, I wasn't clear). I'm using the default provider configuration. Looks like that Github issue is relevant.
b
billowy-army-68599
12/22/2021, 9:14 PM
@victorious-cat-95191 if it's just the urn changing, you might be able to use aliases to stop the replacement
v
victorious-cat-95191
12/23/2021, 10:14 AM@billowy-army-68599 Thanks. I've had a quick look at that and it doesn't work. The Record resource URN doesn't change so adding an alias there doesn't help. It's the URN for the provider within the record resource that causes the Record to be replaced. I guess I'll have to wait for progress on that GIthub issue before I can upgrade.
victorious-cat-95191
12/23/2021, 1:43 PMI manually modified the stack to change the provider to the new version and Pulumi was still trying to replace the Record resources so it looks like it might be to do with the additional `allowOverwrite`property? 🤷♂️
p
prehistoric-activity-61023
12/23/2021, 2:01 PMI tried to do some “hacks” on my part as well with no success. I’d need to look deeper how the plugin code works and why it forces the replacement instead of update (so the additional property
allowOverwriteprehistoric-activity-61023
12/23/2021, 2:03 PMI’m afraid it might be related to the way TF plugin works because I noticed that this plugin is ported from terraform. Still, right now, I cannot help more. If I were you, I’d stick to v3 for now and wait until the GH issue is resolved.
v
victorious-cat-95191
12/23/2021, 5:03 PMIndeed. I'm also struggling to reconcile the changes from this breaking change in the TF provider "resource/cloudflare_record:
dataTypeList5 Views