This message was deleted.

what have you tried? you can probably just write the YAML file directly using your language yaml parser if needed

export interface AtlasCluserConfig {
  autoScalingDiskGbEnabled: boolean;
  mongoDbMajorVersion: string;
  networkpeering: AtlasCluserNetworkPeeringConfig;
  numShards: number;
  provider: AtlasCluserProviderConfig;
  replicationFactor: number;
}

export interface AtlasConfig {
  cluster: AtlasCluserConfig;
  cidr: string;
}

const stack = await LocalWorkspace.createOrSelectStack({
      stackName: stackName,
      projectName: ATLAS_PROJECT,
      program: async () => { 
        console.log(JSON.stringify(pulumiConfig.requireObject<AtlasConfig>('atlas')));

      },
    },
      localworkspace.setLocalWorkspaceOptions(ATLAS_PROJECT, stackName),
    );
await stack.setAllConfig({
'atlas.cidr': { value: '1'},   'atlas.cluster.autoScalingDiskGbEnabled': { value: 'true'}
})

I don't have any bright ideas there I'm afraid, other than using

setAllConfig

and setting a map into it I guess

One more thing, it is only value of type string that is allowed inside Map. And I couldn't find a place to put object value.

I can't speak 100% for the other SDKs - but I will say that for the .NET SDK the decision was made that for complex config scenarios we would just leave the consumer to serialize / deserialize directly to the YAML without supporting it through the Automation API. With .NET particularly it was very difficult to support complex object serialization across both YAML & JSON config scenarios without causing weird collisions of type issues between the 2 or without splitting the API. Similar decisions may have been made in the other SDKs. You shouldn't have any issues reading your structured config from within your

programFunc

as that should still function the same as before the Automation API was released, but you might have to do the writing to the config file yourself.

Thanks for the update!