This message was deleted.

sparse-intern-71089

07/25/2019, 2:15 PM

This message was deleted.

white-balloon-205

07/25/2019, 4:36 PM

You should in generally not need to "capture" them, you should be able to just load them from "inside". As a quite general point, it is worth trying to keep the amount of data that is captured by your automatic lambdas to a minimum. The specifics here likely depend on how your code is structured - but I'd be surprised if you cannot accomplish what you want here by loading the desired librarires inside and capturing only "data" from the ambient environment.

boundless-monkey-50243

07/25/2019, 6:35 PM

I'm confused, at least from idiomatic TypeScript. Are you saying to

require()

them inside the lambda environment?

boundless-monkey-50243

07/25/2019, 6:37 PM

I must be misunderstanding the mechanism behind hoisting libraries (tbh I'm not even sure whether you call doing so capturing, hoisting, etc!). It's pretty magical. 😉

white-balloon-205

07/25/2019, 7:43 PM

If you haven't yet - see https://www.pulumi.com/docs/reference/serializing-functions/#capturing-modules-in-a-javascript-function and the rest of that page generally.

boundless-monkey-50243

07/25/2019, 8:35 PM

Aha. I went looking, but somehow missed that one. Thanks.

Open in Slack

Previous Next

Pulumi Community

No matter how you like to participate in developer communities, Pulumi wants to meet you there. If you want to meet other Pulumi users to share use-cases and best practices, contribute code or documentation, see us at an event, or just tell a story about something cool you did with Pulumi, you are part of our community.