This message was deleted.

sparse-intern-71089

01/12/2021, 1:17 AM

This message was deleted.

little-cartoon-10569

01/12/2021, 1:22 AM

They won't always been known, since the other stack could be running at the same time. Pulumi has to support this case.

little-cartoon-10569

01/12/2021, 1:23 AM

Generally, outputs from StackReferences are used as inputs for other resources, so this problem doesn't occur. Can you split your outputs to be a collection of outputs, instead of an output that is a collection?

little-cartoon-10569

01/12/2021, 1:23 AM

That way, each output can be used directly as an input.

little-cartoon-10569

01/12/2021, 1:24 AM

My equivalent code exports

privateSubnet1Id

isolatedSubnet2Id

, etc.

breezy-butcher-78604

01/12/2021, 1:26 AM

They won't always been known, since the other stack could be running at the same time. Pulumi has to support this case

ah ok, that makes sense

Generally, outputs from StackReferences are used as inputs for other resources

yeah thats typically what happens for me as well but in this case I need to do a foreach over both subnet IDs and route table IDs which i guess isn't possible without an

apply()

little-cartoon-10569

01/12/2021, 1:27 AM

Yes, if you export a complex output then you're likely to have to handle it either in an apply, or in a custom provider.

little-cartoon-10569

01/12/2021, 1:28 AM

Either rework your "source" stack to export simple outputs, or add the complex code in your "destination" stack.

👍 1

breezy-butcher-78604

01/12/2021, 1:29 AM

no worries, thanks for your help (yet again :D)

👍 1

3 Views

Open in Slack

Previous Next

Pulumi Community

No matter how you like to participate in developer communities, Pulumi wants to meet you there. If you want to meet other Pulumi users to share use-cases and best practices, contribute code or documentation, see us at an event, or just tell a story about something cool you did with Pulumi, you are part of our community.