sparse-intern-71089
10/18/2022, 10:17 AMbrief-alligator-51254
10/18/2022, 2:12 PMbrief-alligator-51254
10/19/2022, 8:02 AMbrave-planet-10645
10/19/2022, 9:30 AMcolossal-diamond-64391
10/21/2022, 9:45 PMbrief-alligator-51254
10/23/2022, 3:04 PMWhat are the performance issues you’re seeing when you run Pulumi up?I would say that
pulumi up
is just not designed to perform such action.
The Previewing update
phase takes 39s and the actual Updating
phase takes 47s. The performance is comparable to running pulumi up
in a clean state, so no hot reload by definition.
What are you using as a back end for the state?Local Filesystem
I gave me two cents for a solution in the discussion threadThanks @colossal-diamond-64391!
brave-planet-10645
10/23/2022, 4:16 PMpulumi up --logtostderr --logflow -v=9 2> logs.txt
2. Can you run (you might want to destroy the stack before you run it): pulumi up --tracing=file:./up.trace
And then send over the logs.txt
and the up.trace
file that you produced to me: piers@pulumi.com
Just as an aside, Pulumi does write a lot of checkpoints and if you’re using the local file system as your backend, especially on your local computer, you might find it’s not as performant as using the Pulumi service.