No matter how you like to participate in developer communities, Pulumi wants to meet you there. If you want to meet other Pulumi users to share use-cases and best practices, contribute code or documentation, see us at an event, or just tell a story about something cool you did with Pulumi, you are part of our community.

Pulumi Community

It seems like this architecture could be considered a bug.

<@U022S4W6W00> Would you be able to find someone with an opinion on this? I think it's a bug.. I've just raised this issue: <https://github.com/pulumi/pulumi-docker/issues/402>

As far as I know, we have some ongoing work to improve the Docker provider. What you are describing in the issue is a know behavior that we aim at changing in a future rework of that provider.

Can I bring the issue to the attention of a team member who'd be willing to mark it as in-progress or similar? I'd like to be able to update my clients who are affected by this.

My suggestion would be to detail your current situation in the github issue (no need for names) with as much details as possible, especially on the impact/pain this is causing. If you could add some context on any deadlines, that would be very helpful.