This message was deleted.
# general
s
This message was deleted.
s
I’m not aware of a way to do that without also giving up resource auto-naming. I typically use tags to help provide that sort of functionality, but I understand that’s not necessarily an ideal solution.
b
tags shoudl do the work ahaha thanks
then, is there any suggestion regarding resource naming? maybe, the best is to name the resource as the variable?
s
That’s a pretty common approach. You could also use something like
fmt.Sprintf
(sorry, I tend to use Go most of the time) to build some sort of prefix or such into the resource name.
👍🏾 1
l
Resource autonaming supports the namePrefix property on many resources.
But tags is a good way to go. This is why AWS classic had defaultTags added to the provider.