sparse-intern-71089
09/27/2023, 4:46 PMstocky-restaurant-98004
09/27/2023, 4:59 PMabundant-knife-92318
09/27/2023, 5:01 PMstocky-restaurant-98004
09/27/2023, 5:01 PMstocky-restaurant-98004
09/27/2023, 5:01 PMforeach id in subnetIds
.abundant-knife-92318
09/27/2023, 5:02 PMstocky-restaurant-98004
09/27/2023, 5:03 PMProjectIpAccessList
in a separate stack if the overhead is worth the safety you'd get.stocky-restaurant-98004
09/27/2023, 5:04 PMabundant-knife-92318
09/27/2023, 5:05 PMabundant-knife-92318
09/27/2023, 5:10 PMstocky-restaurant-98004
09/28/2023, 10:02 PM/32
for these rules (i.e. a single IP), you might be able to avoid the apply. Could you maybe provision the public IP separately and pass it through?