No matter how you like to participate in developer communities, Pulumi wants to meet you there. If you want to meet other Pulumi users to share use-cases and best practices, contribute code or documentation, see us at an event, or just tell a story about something cool you did with Pulumi, you are part of our community.

Pulumi Community

Heeey everyone, I made a library porting a useful piece of the Node SDK internals to be more generalized and work with ESM. Some portions of it were a direct copy from Pulumi source since those portions were already generic.

Can someone from the Pulumi team or someone more versed in OSS licenses check if what I'm doing is ok and attributed correctly?
I'm not a lawyer nor a native English speaker so reading about what should be attributed to Pulumi vs to me was a bit daunting.

<https://inox-tools.vercel.app/inline-mod#licensing-notice|https://inox-tools.vercel.app/inline-mod#licensing-notice>

Also not a lawyer, however your package.json should cite both licenses instead of just MIT.
`"license": "(MIT AND Apache-2.0)"`

Oh, right. Didn't knew I could do that.
Thanks