This message was deleted.
# general
s
This message was deleted.
b
@swift-intern-18856 are you hardcoding your AMI or allowing it to pull the latest? this doesn't look like a regression, it's expected behaviour as far as I'm aware
s
am i understanding the resolution of the linked ticket incorrectly?
it seems to suggest image id will be ignored after the cluster is created
b
the linked issue is from 2019, I believe we changed the behaviour since then again because otherwise it becomes difficult to update a launchconfiguration ami id
in any case, it's relatively easy to fix by specifying an amiId
❤️ 1
s
okay yeah, not hard to specify
a little surprising that that’s the default behavior, kinda agree with the original ticket that’s a huge foot gun
thanks for your help!
r
@swift-intern-18856 btw a complete node roll is normal and healthy in kubernetes. If you can't roll you got problems that will bite you eventually. Unplanned version upgrades... not so much. I can see why people want this but it seems a not grow defailt