This message was deleted.

1. No, the most common convention is to write one project per deployment cadence. If things get deployed at the same time, then they should be in the same project. 2. Pulumi doesn't encourage this. Hopefully that's just the way examples are written? 3. The everyone-on-one-box and Ansible-replacement ideas aren't really what Pulumi is for. Its main purpose is to deploy infrastructure: installing applications afterwards can be done using Pulumi, but it's not the primary goal. So you'll probably encounter some awkwardness getting this working.

1. I should say that the only reason these apps are deployed together right now is because they run on the same machine and sit behind the same reverse proxy. With Pulumi I expect them to be totally independent. 2. I figure there is still work involved when switching from one provider to another though? In which case if I’m worried about that, I should just use Kubernetes, which could be running anywhere? 3. Makes sense, as well as with the ansible stuff. I figure it’s Pulumi first, Ansible next.

2. Nope, you just set up your various provider objects (e.g. AWS us-west-2, GitHub, Docker, Slack etc.); Pulumi figures out which provider to use based on the type of the resource you create. You can even have multiple providers of the same type (e.g. AWS us-west-2 + AWS eu-west-1) and pass in the appropriate one to individual resources.

That’s sort of my question though, I need to change what resources I’m using, which involves figuring out how to use pulumi_aws vs pulumi_azure for example, vs. just using pulumi_kubernetes and then any change in provider is handled completely transparently from that perspective

Only from an application deployment point of view.. which is not what AWS or Azure are for. Unless you plan to deploy k8s once and manually, you'll need either AWS or Azure or GCP, won't you?

I’m thinking from a pulumi program point of view.

Me too.

I’m referring to this page: https://www.pulumi.com/docs/get-started/. It asks you to select a provider. If I select AWS I end up writing my program with a bunch of aws specific stuff, vs generic k8s, which could then be pointed at google / aws / whoever managed kubernetes

IMO, you don't get much (any?) benefit from k8s if you're using it as a deployment facilitator. The benefit comes mostly from redundancy / recovery / it-can-look-after-itself-ness.

Alright appreciate all the help, I think in that case I’ll just pick a cloud provider to start with, I don’t have a need for most of the Kubernetes stuff right now. The insight on being locked in regardless is helpful

By the time you've set up a minimal VPC + firewalls to put either EKS or EC2 in, you'll have enough expertise to choose between them 🙂