This message was deleted.

😡😡😡 this should ahve been logical, except that the docs don’t really make it clear (“The unique name of the resource.“?) Turns out this is the actual domain name

Hello @rhythmic-branch-12845, because most providers have a flat namespace, Pulumi applies an auto-naming technique which takes the logical name and suffixes it with a hash, this to prevent collisions when multiple stacks are created in e.g. the same AWS account. However, in some cases like S3 bucket names or Route53 domain names, you want to take control of the physical name as well. In such cases, you can pass the physical resource name as well. For Route53, this should look like:

"""An AWS Python Pulumi program"""

import pulumi
import pulumi_aws as aws

main = aws.route53.Zone("main", name="top.level.domain", tags={ "mananged_by": "Pulumi" })

pulumi.export('route53_Zone__main__name_servers', main.name_servers)

sorry, actually no (and this is the confusing bit):

resource_name

isn’t even the real domain name; Pulumi adds some ridiculous suffix to it, so that the actual domain you create has some suffix like (in my case

-2e9f86f

)… Seriously. 1. the doc should just give a proper example. You need to supply the

name

parameter! (aws.route53.Zone(name=“example.com”, …)`) 2. the required

resource_name

parameter is just a trap. What is it for? as mentioned, it does absolutely nothing useful (if it’s used for the actual domain name, then it produces a useless zone because of the suffix; if

name=

is supplied, why would we care?

The

resource_name

is how Pulumi identifies the resource under management in the state file. If you go through that page on

Resource Names

I linked higher up, I hope it makes things clear for you. Do reach out if you would still have any questions.

thanks. I do have 2 other questions above this one if you don’t mind

Do feel free to ask questions 🙂 you don't need permission to ask away